e2e test for organization teams page #1474
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple updates across various Handlebars templates and a Cypress testing configuration. The changes primarily involve adding Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
eac7a0c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://141a9c87.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pd-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organ.irenestaging.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
cypress/support/application.routes.ts (1)
8-8: Approve with a minor suggestion: Add leading slash to the pathThe addition of the
organizationTeamsroute is good and aligns with the PR objective. However, there's a minor inconsistency in the path format.Consider adding a leading forward slash to maintain consistency with other routes:
- organizationTeams: 'dashboard/organization/teams', + organizationTeams: '/dashboard/organization/teams',app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (3)
1-7: Consider removing redundant test attribute and standardizing naming convention.The addition of
data-test-cy='org-team-overview'is good for e2e testing. However, there's already a similar attributedata-test-orgTeamOverview. To avoid redundancy and maintain consistency:
- Consider removing
data-test-orgTeamOverview.- Standardize the naming convention. If kebab-case is preferred for Cypress tests, consider updating other
data-test-*attributes to follow this convention.Here's a suggested change:
<AkStack - data-test-orgTeamOverview data-test-cy='org-team-overview' @direction='column' role='button' local-class='org-team-overview-container' {{on 'click' this.showTeamDetails}} >
Line range hint
8-16: Consider removing redundant test attribute and standardizing naming convention.Similar to the previous comment, there's a redundancy in test attributes here. To maintain consistency:
- Consider removing
data-test-orgTeamOverview-name.- Ensure the naming convention is consistent with other Cypress test attributes.
Here's a suggested change:
<AkTypography - data-test-orgTeamOverview-name data-test-cy='org-team-overview-name' @variant='h5' @color='primary' @gutterBottom={{true}} > {{@team.name}} </AkTypography>
Line range hint
1-41: Consider updating all test attributes for consistencyTo fully align with the e2e testing enhancements and maintain consistency throughout the file, consider updating all
data-test-*attributes to use thedata-test-cyformat with kebab-case. This would make the test selectors uniform and easier to maintain.Here's a suggested change for the remaining attributes:
<AkStack @spacing='2'> <AkTypography - data-test-orgTeamOverview-membersCount + data-test-cy='org-team-overview-members-count' local-class='upper-case' @color='textSecondary' @variant='body2' @tag='span' > {{t 'users'}} <strong>{{@team.membersCount}}</strong> </AkTypography> <AkTypography - data-test-orgTeamOverview-projectsCount + data-test-cy='org-team-overview-projects-count' local-class='upper-case' @color='textSecondary' @variant='body2' @tag='span' > {{t 'projects'}} <strong>{{@team.projectsCount}}</strong> </AkTypography> </AkStack>This change would ensure all test attributes follow the same convention, improving maintainability and readability of both the component and the corresponding tests.
app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1)
29-29: LGTM! Consider standardizing test attributes.The addition of the
data-test-cyattribute enhances the testability of the component, which aligns well with the PR objective of adding e2e tests. This change is approved.However, I noticed that this button already has a
data-test-orgCreateTeam-submitBtnattribute. To maintain consistency and reduce redundancy, consider standardizing on one test attribute convention across the codebase. Ifdata-test-cyis the preferred format for Cypress tests, you might want to replace the existingdata-test-orgCreateTeam-submitBtnwith adata-test-cyequivalent in future refactoring.app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1)
18-18: LGTM: Test identifier added for Cypress testingThe addition of
data-test-cy='teamDetail-closeBtn'to theAkIconButtoncomponent is appropriate for Cypress testing purposes. This change aligns with the PR objective of enhancing e2e testing capabilities for the organization teams page.A few observations:
- The naming convention used ('teamDetail-closeBtn') is clear and descriptive.
- It's consistent with other test identifiers in the file (e.g., 'data-test-orgTeamDetail-title').
- This addition will make it easier to target this specific button in Cypress tests.
Consider standardizing the prefix across all test identifiers in this file. For example, you could change 'data-test-orgTeamDetail-title' to 'data-test-cy-teamDetail-title' for consistency.
app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs (2)
30-34: LGTM! Consider consolidating test attributes.The addition of the
data-test-cyattribute enhances the component's testability for Cypress, which aligns well with the PR's objective of improving e2e testing. The attribute name 'invitationList-row' is descriptive and follows a consistent naming convention.Consider consolidating the two test attributes to reduce duplication:
<b.row - data-test-cy='invitationList-row' - data-test-invitation-list-row + data-test-cy='invitation-list-row' as |r| >This change would maintain the enhanced testability while reducing attribute duplication. However, ensure this doesn't break any existing tests that might rely on the
data-test-invitation-list-rowattribute.
Line range hint
1-72: Consider style improvements and additional test attributesWhile the changes look good, here are some suggestions to further improve the code:
Standardize quote usage: Consider using single quotes consistently throughout the file for attribute values.
Correct indentation: Ensure consistent indentation, especially within nested blocks.
Add more test attributes: To further enhance e2e testing capabilities, consider adding
data-test-cyattributes to other key elements, such as:
- The AkTable component
- The table head (t.head)
- Individual cells (r.cell)
- The AkPagination component
Here's an example of how you might add these attributes:
These changes would further improve the testability of the component while maintaining a clean and consistent code style.
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2)
96-99: LGTM! Consider aligning the alias with the key name.The
teamsListroute definition looks good. It correctly uses a wildcard for dynamic organization IDs.For consistency, consider changing the alias to match the key name:
teamsList: { route: '/api/organizations/*/teams*', - alias: 'teamList', + alias: 'teamsList', },
108-111: LGTM! Well-structured route for editing user information.The
editUserInforoute is correctly defined with wildcards for dynamic organization and user IDs.Note that the alias "editUser" is slightly different from the key name "editUserInfo". This is acceptable as it's more concise, but ensure it's used consistently throughout the codebase.
app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1)
60-64: Approve the addition of Cypress test attribute, but consider consistency and redundancy.The addition of the
data-test-cy='addProjectList-row'attribute is good for enhancing Cypress test capabilities. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
There's an existing
data-test-addProjectList-rowattribute, which seems redundant. Consider removing one of these attributes to avoid duplication.The naming convention for the new attribute (
addProjectList-row) uses camelCase, while the existing one uses kebab-case. It's recommended to align the naming conventions for consistency across your test attributes.Consider applying this change for consistency and to remove redundancy:
<b.row - data-test-cy='addProjectList-row' - data-test-addProjectList-row + data-test-cy='add-project-list-row' as |r| >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (5)
100-103: LGTM! Well-defined route for team editing.The
editTeamroute definition is correct and consistent. It properly uses wildcards for dynamic organization and team IDs, and the alias matches the key name.
104-107: LGTM! Clear and consistent organization route definition.The
organizationroute is well-defined with a wildcard for dynamic organization IDs. The key name and alias are consistent.
112-115: LGTM! Clear and consistent users list route definition.The
usersListroute is well-defined with a wildcard for dynamic organization IDs. The key name and alias are consistent.
116-119: LGTM! Well-structured route for team invitations.The
inviteTeamroute is correctly defined with wildcards for dynamic organization and team IDs. The key name and alias are consistent.
96-119: Summary: New routes align well with PR objectivesThe added routes (
teamsList,editTeam,organization,editUserInfo,usersList, andinviteTeam) are well-structured and consistent with existing patterns. They enhance API routing capabilities for managing organizations, teams, and users, which aligns perfectly with the PR objective of adding e2e tests for the organization teams page.Minor suggestions were made for consistency in aliases, but overall, these additions provide a solid foundation for the planned e2e tests.
app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1)
60-60: LGTM: Enhanced testability with Cypress selectorThe addition of
data-test-cy='userList-row'improves the component's testability for Cypress e2e tests. This change aligns well with the PR objective of adding e2e tests for the organization teams page. The existingdata-test-addUserList-rowattribute is retained, ensuring backwards compatibility with any existing tests.cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1)
36-40: [Verify] Check for suppressed exceptions impacting test reliabilitySuppressing uncaught exceptions might hide legitimate errors. Let's verify if any exceptions are being thrown during tests that need attention.
Run the following script to list uncaught exceptions in your tests:
If uncaught exceptions are found, consider handling them appropriately in your tests or application code.
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 06m 23s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Avi Shah |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
1
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
26
|
Tests for review
cypress/tests/dynamic-scan.spec.ts • 1 failed test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Scan > it tests dynamic scan for an apk file: 58062 |
Test Replay
Screenshots
|
|
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
a0e24c1 to
5cde4ae
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1)
99-148: Comprehensive test for team creation and deletionThis test case effectively covers the team creation and deletion process:
- It verifies the presence of necessary UI elements.
- It performs the creation and deletion actions.
- It checks for success messages and verifies the team's presence/absence in the list.
The test provides good coverage of the feature. However, to reduce potential flakiness, consider adding specific timeouts to success message assertions:
- cy.findByText(cyTranslate('teamCreated'), ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS).should('exist'); + cy.findByText(cyTranslate('teamCreated'), ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS).should('exist', { timeout: 10000 });Apply similar changes to other success message assertions in this test case.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (11)
36-40: Reconsider global suppression of uncaught exceptionsThe global suppression of uncaught exceptions is still present. As mentioned in a previous review, this practice can mask real issues in your application.
Consider removing this global handler or handling specific known exceptions to ensure that unexpected errors are caught during testing.
22-24: Use a placeholder domain for test emailsAs noted in a previous review, using a real email domain (
appknox.io) in test data can lead to unintended consequences. Consider using a placeholder domain likeexample.comor a domain specifically designed for testing purposes.Apply this diff to update the test email:
- inviteEmail: '[email protected]', + inviteEmail: '[email protected]',
42-73: Well-structured test setupThe
beforeEachhook is well-organized and follows good practices:
- It sets up network interceptions for relevant API routes.
- It logs in the user and visits the correct page before each test.
- It waits for necessary network responses and UI elements to ensure the page is fully loaded.
This setup provides a solid foundation for the subsequent tests.
75-97: Comprehensive test for team search functionalityThis test case effectively covers the team search feature:
- It verifies the existence of the search input.
- It performs a search and checks that the correct team is displayed.
- It ensures that the search input can be cleared.
The assertions are clear and relevant, providing good coverage of the search functionality.
150-209: Comprehensive test for project management in teamsThis test case effectively covers adding and removing projects from a team:
- It locates the correct team and opens its details.
- It adds a project to the team and verifies the success message.
- It removes the project from the team and verifies the success message.
The test provides good coverage of the project management functionality within teams.
175-176: Fix missing closing bracket in selectorsAs noted in a previous review, the selectors for team detail action buttons are missing closing brackets. This could lead to incorrect element selection or test failures.
Apply this diff to fix the selectors:
- cy.get('[data-test-teamDetailAction-actionBtn]') + cy.get('[data-test-teamDetailAction-actionBtn]') - cy.get('[data-test-teamdetailaction-titlebtn]').click(); + cy.get('[data-test-teamdetailaction-titlebtn]').click();Also applies to: 187-187
211-275: Comprehensive test for user management in teamsThis test case effectively covers adding and removing users from a team:
- It locates the correct team and opens its details.
- It adds a user to the team and verifies the success message.
- It removes the user from the team and verifies the success message.
The test provides good coverage of the user management functionality within teams.
277-323: Comprehensive test for inviting users to teamsThis test case effectively covers the process of inviting users to a team:
- It locates the correct team and opens its details.
- It invites a user to the team and verifies the success message.
- It deletes the invitation and verifies the success message.
The test provides good coverage of the user invitation functionality within teams.
1-323: Overall assessment of organization teams testsThis file provides comprehensive test coverage for the organization teams functionality. The tests are well-structured and cover key aspects such as team search, creation/deletion, project management, user management, and user invitations.
Key strengths:
- Thorough setup in the
beforeEachhook.- Good use of constants and wait options for improved maintainability.
- Comprehensive coverage of various team management scenarios.
Areas for improvement:
- Address the global exception handling to avoid masking real issues.
- Use a placeholder domain for test emails.
- Refactor repeated code for opening team drawers into a custom command.
- Fix missing closing brackets in some selectors.
- Consider adding specific timeouts to success message assertions to reduce potential flakiness.
Addressing these points will further enhance the quality and maintainability of these tests.
213-220: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor repeated code into a custom command
As suggested in a previous review, the steps to find and open a team's detail drawer are repeated across multiple tests. Consider extracting this into a custom Cypress command to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
For example, add a custom command in
cypress/support/commands.js:Cypress.Commands.add('openTeamDrawer', (teamName) => { cy.findAllByTestId('org-team-overview-name', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .contains(teamName) .should('exist') .click(); });Then, replace the repeated code in your test:
- cy.findAllByTestId('org-team-overview-name', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) - .contains(TEST_DATA.teamName) - .should('exist') - .as('cypressTeam'); - - // Open drawer - cy.get('@cypressTeam').click(); + cy.openTeamDrawer(TEST_DATA.teamName);Also, fix the missing closing bracket in the selector:
- cy.get('[data-test-teamdetailaction-titlebtn]').click(); + cy.get('[data-test-teamdetailaction-titlebtn]').click();Also applies to: 248-248
278-285: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor repeated code into a custom command
As suggested earlier, the steps to find and open a team's detail drawer are repeated. Consider using the custom
openTeamDrawercommand proposed earlier to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.Replace the repeated code with:
cy.openTeamDrawer(TEST_DATA.teamName);This will make the test more concise and easier to maintain.
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
5cde4ae to
dbffa03
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2)
96-99: LGTM! Consider aligning the alias with the key name.The
teamsListroute definition looks good. It correctly uses a wildcard for the organization ID, allowing for dynamic routing.For consistency, consider changing the alias to match the key name:
teamsList: { route: '/api/organizations/*/teams*', - alias: 'teamList', + alias: 'teamsList', },
120-123: LGTM! Consider aligning the alias with the key name.The
editUserInforoute definition is correct and uses appropriate wildcards for organization and user IDs.For consistency, consider changing the alias to match the key name:
editUserInfo: { route: '/api/organizations/*/users/*', - alias: 'editUser', + alias: 'editUserInfo', },cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1)
84-84: Consider enabling skipped testsSeveral tests are currently marked with
it.skip(...), which means they are skipped and not executed. Enabling these tests will improve test coverage and ensure the related functionalities are validated. If the tests are not ready to be run, consider adding comments to explain the reason for skipping and any prerequisites needed before they can be enabled.Also applies to: 113-113, 195-195, 287-287
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (8)
100-103: LGTM! Well-defined route for team editing.The
editTeamroute definition is correct and consistent. It properly uses wildcards for both organization and team IDs, allowing for dynamic routing.
104-107: LGTM! Comprehensive route definition for team member operations.The
teamMemberroute definition is well-structured. It correctly uses wildcards for organization, team, and member IDs, providing flexibility for various operations on individual team members.
108-111: LGTM! Well-defined route for listing team members.The
teamMembersListroute definition is excellent. It correctly uses wildcards for organization and team IDs, and the trailing wildcard allows for query parameters, which is ideal for list endpoints.
112-115: LGTM! Precise route definition for team project operations.The
teamProjectroute definition is well-structured. It correctly uses wildcards for organization, team, and project IDs, allowing for flexible operations on specific team projects.
116-119: LGTM! Clear and concise organization route definition.The
organizationroute definition is straightforward and effective. It properly uses a wildcard for the organization ID, allowing for operations on specific organizations.
124-127: LGTM! Well-structured route for listing users.The
usersListroute definition is excellent. It correctly uses a wildcard for the organization ID, and the trailing wildcard allows for query parameters, which is ideal for list endpoints.
128-131: LGTM! Comprehensive route for team invitations.The
inviteTeamroute definition is well-structured. It correctly uses wildcards for organization and team IDs, and the "invitations*" ending allows for both creating and potentially listing invitations.
96-131: Overall, excellent additions to support e2e testing for organization teams.These new API route definitions align well with the PR objective of adding e2e tests for the organization teams page. They provide comprehensive coverage for team and user management operations within organizations, which will facilitate robust Cypress testing.
The additions are consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions in the file. The use of wildcards for dynamic IDs and the inclusion of potential query parameters for list endpoints demonstrate good API design practices.
Minor suggestions were made for alias consistency, but these are not critical issues. Great work on expanding the API routes to support the new e2e tests!
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
dbffa03 to
7257a6d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2)
96-99: Consider aligning the alias with the key name for consistency.The key name is
teamsList, but the alias is set toteamList. To maintain consistency and avoid potential confusion, consider changing the alias to match the key name.teamsList: { route: '/api/organizations/*/teams*', - alias: 'teamList', + alias: 'teamsList', },
120-123: Consider aligning the alias with the key name for consistency.The key name is
editUserInfo, but the alias is set toeditUser. To maintain consistency and avoid potential confusion, consider changing the alias to match the key name.editUserInfo: { route: '/api/organizations/*/users/*', - alias: 'editUser', + alias: 'editUserInfo', },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
- cypress/support/application.routes.ts
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1)
32-32: Approve the addition of an extra container for E2E tests.The increase in the number of containers from 4 to 5 aligns with the PR objective of adding a new e2e test for the organization teams page. This change should improve test parallelization and potentially reduce overall test execution time.
To ensure this change has the desired effect, please verify the following after merging:
- Check if the E2E test execution time has decreased.
- Monitor resource usage and any associated costs to ensure they remain within acceptable limits.
- Confirm that all tests, including the new organization teams test, are distributed evenly across the containers.
You can use the following script to check the distribution of tests across containers in recent workflow runs:
This script will help you verify that the tests are being distributed evenly across the new set of 5 containers.
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (8)
100-103: LGTM: TheeditTeamroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
editTeamis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
104-107: LGTM: TheteamMemberroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
teamMemberis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
108-111: LGTM: TheteamMembersListroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
teamMembersListis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
112-115: LGTM: TheteamProjectroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
teamProjectis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
116-119: LGTM: Theorganizationroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
organizationis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
124-127: LGTM: TheusersListroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
usersListis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
128-131: LGTM: TheinviteTeamroute definition is correct and consistent.The route definition for
inviteTeamis well-structured and follows the established pattern in the file.
96-131: Overall, the new route definitions are well-structured and consistent.The additions to the
API_ROUTESconstant are generally well-implemented and follow the established patterns in the file. There are only two minor suggestions for improvement regarding alias consistency:
- Consider changing the alias for
teamsListfrom 'teamList' to 'teamsList'.- Consider changing the alias for
editUserInfofrom 'editUser' to 'editUserInfo'.These changes would enhance the overall consistency of the route definitions.
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
7257a6d to
fbf4be3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1)
144-147: LGTM:inviteTeamroute added, consider renaming.The
inviteTeamroute is well-defined and follows RESTful API design principles. However, consider renaming it toteamInvitationsto better align with other route naming conventions in the file (e.g.,teamsList,teamMembers). This would make it clearer that the route is for managing team invitations rather than inviting an entire team.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (6)
96-99: LGTM:teamsListroute added correctly.The
teamsListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles.
100-103: LGTM:teamMembersroute added correctly.The
teamMembersroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. This route appears to be for accessing a specific team member, which is different from the previously removedteamMembersroute.
104-107: LGTM:teamMembersListroute added correctly.The
teamMembersListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. This route appears to replace the functionality of the previously removedteamMembersroute, providing a clear distinction between accessing a list of team members and a specific team member.
108-111: LGTM:teamProjectroute added correctly.The
teamProjectroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It provides a clear path for accessing specific projects within a team and organization context.
140-143: LGTM:usersListroute added correctly.The
usersListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It provides a clear path for accessing the list of users within an organization context.
Line range hint
96-147: Overall, the changes align well with the PR objectives.The added routes provide comprehensive coverage for team management and organization operations, which is essential for implementing e2e tests for the organization teams page. The new routes follow existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles, ensuring consistency within the codebase.
cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (5)
24-26: Consider using a test-specific email domainThe test data is using a real email domain (
appknox.io). It's generally better to use a placeholder domain likeexample.comfor testing purposes to avoid potential issues with real email addresses.
262-265: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove selector readability using
cy.contains()Instead of using
filter()with string concatenation, consider usingcy.contains()for better readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to improve the selector:
- cy.get('tr', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) - .filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.projectName + ')') + cy.contains('tr', TEST_DATA.projectName, ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .should('exist') .as('addedProjectRow');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
356-360: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove selector readability using
cy.contains()Similar to the previous suggestion, use
cy.contains()here for better readability.Apply this diff to improve the selector:
- cy.get('tr', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) - .filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.testUser.username + ')') + cy.contains('tr', TEST_DATA.testUser.username, ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .should('exist') .as('addedUserRow');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
458-458:⚠️ Potential issueSet
testCompletedtotrueafter successful test executionSimilar to the previous comment, setting
testCompletedtofalseat the end of the test may cause unnecessary cleanup.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- cy.wrap(false).as('testCompleted'); + cy.wrap(true).as('testCompleted');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
381-381:⚠️ Potential issueSet
testCompletedtotrueafter successful test executionSetting
testCompletedtofalseat the end of the test may cause unnecessary cleanup even when the test passes successfully.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- cy.wrap(false).as('testCompleted'); + cy.wrap(true).as('testCompleted');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
fbf4be3 to
d1a1be8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (2)
42-46: Reconsider global exception handling approachThe current approach of suppressing all uncaught exceptions globally may mask real issues in your application. Consider handling expected exceptions specifically or adjusting your tests to accommodate them.
1-476: Well-structured and comprehensive test suiteOverall, this test suite provides thorough coverage of the organization teams functionality. The tests are well-organized and cover important scenarios such as team creation, user management, and project management.
To further improve the code:
- Implement custom commands to reduce duplication.
- Address the global exception handling as mentioned earlier.
These changes will enhance the maintainability and robustness of your test suite.
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 14m 51s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Avi Shah |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
|
Failures
|
1
|
|
Flaky
|
0
|
|
Pending
|
0
|
|
Skipped
|
0
|
|
Passing
|
31
|
Upgrade your plan to view test results. | |
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Tests for review
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
d1a1be8 to
1a84f40
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1)
148-151: Consider renaminginviteTeamfor clarity.The
inviteTeamroute is well-defined and follows the existing conventions. However, the name might be slightly misleading.Consider renaming
inviteTeamtoinviteTeamMembersorteamInvitationsto more accurately reflect its purpose of managing invitations for team members.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (6)
96-99: LGTM:teamsListroute added correctly.The
teamsListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other list routes in the file.
100-103: LGTM:organizationTeamsroute added correctly.The
organizationTeamsroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other single-item routes in the file.
104-107: LGTM:teamMembersroute added correctly.The
teamMembersroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other single-item routes in the file.
108-111: LGTM:teamMembersListroute added correctly.The
teamMembersListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other list routes in the file.
112-115: LGTM:teamProjectroute added correctly.The
teamProjectroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other single-item routes in the file.
144-147: LGTM:usersListroute added correctly.The
usersListroute is well-defined and follows the existing naming conventions and RESTful API design principles. It's consistent with other list routes in the file.cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (5)
42-46: Reconsider global suppression of uncaught exceptionsDisabling uncaught exceptions globally with
Cypress.on('uncaught:exception', () => false);can mask real issues in your application that should be addressed. It's better to handle expected exceptions specifically or adjust your tests to accommodate them.Consider removing the global exception handler or handling specific known exceptions to ensure that unexpected errors are caught during testing.
24-26: Use a placeholder domain for test email addressesUsing a real email domain (
appknox.io) in test data can lead to unintended consequences if emails are accidentally sent. Consider using a placeholder domain likeexample.comor a domain specifically designed for testing purposes.Apply this diff to update the test email:
- inviteEmail: '[email protected]', + inviteEmail: '[email protected]',
308-315: Extract repeated code into custom commandsThere are several instances of repeated code across the test cases, such as opening the team drawer and verifying team existence. Consider extracting these into custom Cypress commands to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
For example, you could create a custom command for opening the team drawer:
Cypress.Commands.add('openTeamDrawer', (teamName) => { cy.findAllByTestId('org-team-overview-name', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .contains(teamName) .should('exist') .click(); });Then, replace the repeated code in your tests with:
cy.openTeamDrawer(TEST_DATA.teamName);Also applies to: 405-412
263-266: Usecy.contains()for better readabilityInstead of using
cy.get('tr').filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.projectName + ')'), you can usecy.contains()which is more readable and reliable.Apply this diff:
- cy.get('tr', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) - .filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.projectName + ')') + cy.contains('tr', TEST_DATA.projectName, ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .should('exist') .as('addedProjectRow');
358-361: Usecy.contains()for better readabilitySimilarly, replace
cy.get('tr').filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.testUser.username + ')')withcy.contains()for improved readability.Apply this diff:
- cy.get('tr', ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) - .filter(':contains(' + TEST_DATA.testUser.username + ')') + cy.contains('tr', TEST_DATA.testUser.username, ELEMENT_WAIT_OPTS) .should('exist') .as('addedUserRow');
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
from
1a84f40 to
eac7a0c
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (1)
148-151: Consider renaming for clarity.While the route structure is correct, the name
inviteTeamsuggests an action rather than a resource. Consider renaming toteamInvitationsto better reflect that this is a collection endpoint for team invitations.- inviteTeam: { + teamInvitations: { route: '/api/organizations/*/teams/*/invitations*', - alias: 'inviteTeam', + alias: 'teamInvitations', },cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1)
84-460: Add test cases for error scenariosThe current test suite only covers happy path scenarios. Consider adding test cases for error scenarios such as:
- Network request failures
- Invalid input handling
- Permission denied scenarios
- Rate limiting scenarios
For example, you could add:
it('should handle network errors when creating team', function () { cy.intercept(API_ROUTES.teamsList.route, { statusCode: 500, body: { error: 'Internal Server Error' } }).as('createTeamError'); // Test steps... cy.findByText(cyTranslate('errorCreatingTeam')).should('exist'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- app/components/ak-modal/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- cypress/support/api.routes.ts (2 hunks)
- cypress/tests/organization-teams.spec.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/components/ak-modal/index.hbs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/create-team/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/details/index.hbs
- app/components/organization-team/overview/index.hbs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
cypress/support/api.routes.ts (4)
96-103: LGTM! Routes follow RESTful conventions.The team listing routes are well-structured, following RESTful conventions with clear distinction between collection and single resource endpoints.
112-115: LGTM! Route follows nested resource pattern.The team project route is well-structured and follows the established pattern for nested resources.
144-147: LGTM! Route follows list endpoint convention.The users list route is well-structured and consistent with other list endpoints in the file.
116-119:⚠️ Potential issueRoute conflict with organizationList still needs addressing.
The
organizationroute ('/api/organizations/') conflicts with the existingorganizationListroute ('/api/organizations'). This could lead to ambiguous route matching in Cypress tests.Consider making the route more specific:
- organization: { - route: '/api/organizations/*', - alias: 'organization', - }, + organization: { + route: '/api/organizations/details/*', + alias: 'organization', + },
future-pirate-king
deleted the
PD-1546-e-2-e-test-for-organization-teams
branch
No description provided.