fix project settings deprecation #1476
Conversation
future-pirate-king
requested review from
Praseetha-KR,
cosmosgenius and
Yibaebi
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes focused on modifying how various components handle array data, specifically replacing the use of Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
app/models/scan-parameter.ts (1)
25-25: LGTM! Consider reordering options for consistency.The addition of
async: trueto the@belongsTodecorator forscanParameterGroupis appropriate:
- It enables lazy loading of the related scan parameter group, potentially improving performance.
- It aligns with the asynchronous nature indicated by the
AsyncBelongsTo<ScanParameterGroupModel>type.For consistency with the
lastUpdatedBydecorator, consider reordering the options:@belongsTo('scan-parameter-group', { async: true, inverse: 'scanParameters' })This places the
asyncoption first in both decorators, improving readability.app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts (2)
59-59: Approved: Good optimization using standard JavaScript methodThe change from
toArray()toslice()is a positive optimization.slice()is a standard JavaScript method that creates a shallow copy of the array, which is generally more efficient thantoArray(). This change also aligns the code better with standard JavaScript practices, improving readability and maintainability.Consider applying this change consistently across the codebase where
toArray()is used in similar contexts. This will ensure uniformity and potentially improve performance in other areas of the application.
Consider applying
slice()instead oftoArray()across the codebaseThe verification found 70 occurrences of
toArray()across 33 TypeScript files. To ensure consistency and improve performance, consider refactoring these instances to useslice()where appropriate.Files to update:
- app/components/file-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-list/index.ts
- app/components/sbom/app-list/index.ts
- app/components/sbom/component-details/vulnerabilities/index.ts
- app/components/sbom/scan-report-drawer/report-list/index.ts
- app/components/sbom/app-scan/list/index.ts
- app/components/sbom/scan-details/component-list/index.ts
- app/components/security/project-search-list/index.ts
- app/components/security/file-search-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/client-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.ts
- app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.ts
- app/components/organization-namespace/index.ts
- app/components/organization-team/project-list/index.ts
- app/components/organization-team/member-list/index.ts
- app/components/organization-team/index.ts
- app/components/organization-member/list/index.ts
- app/components/organization-member/list/member-details/index.ts
- app/components/organization-member/list/add-to-team/index.ts
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-project/index.ts
- app/components/organization-invitation-list/index.ts
- app/components/organization-team/add-team-member/index.ts
- app/components/modals/org-file-cleanup-list/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis/table/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.ts
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/captured-apis/index.ts
- app/components/app-monitoring/table/index.ts
- app/components/app-monitoring/table/store-version/index.ts
- app/components/app-monitoring/version-table/index.ts
- app/components/app-monitoring/version-table/countries/index.ts
- app/components/account-settings/developer-settings/personal-token-list/index.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-77: Consider a broader refactoring effortWhile this change is beneficial, it might be part of a larger effort to modernize the codebase. Consider reviewing other components and services for similar uses of
toArray()that could be replaced withslice(). This would ensure consistency across the project and potentially improve overall performance.To identify other potential areas for similar refactoring, you can run the following script:
This will help identify other files where similar refactoring could be applied.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other occurrences of toArray() in TypeScript files # Search for toArray() usage in TypeScript files echo "Files containing toArray():" rg --type typescript 'toArray\(\)' -l # Count the occurrences echo "Total occurrences of toArray():" rg --type typescript 'toArray\(\)' -c | awk -F ':' '{sum += $2} END {print sum}'Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other occurrences of toArray() in TypeScript files # Search for toArray() usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Files containing toArray():" rg 'toArray\(\)' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -l # Count the total occurrences of toArray() echo "Total occurrences of toArray():" rg 'toArray\(\)' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" | wc -lLength of output: 2138
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (2)
70-70: Approved: Good update toorganizationTeamsgetter.The change from
toArray()toslice()is a good update, likely addressing a deprecation in Ember Data. Creating a shallow copy before sorting ensures immutability of the original data.For improved clarity, consider extracting the sorting logic into a separate line:
get organizationTeams() { const teams = this.orgTeamRecordResponse?.slice() || []; return teams.sortBy('created:desc'); }This separation makes the code slightly more readable and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-145: Consider consistent error handling across all asynchronous operations.The
fetchOrganizationTeamstask properly handles errors, which is great. For consistency, consider applying similar error handling to other asynchronous operations in the component, if any. This ensures a uniform user experience when dealing with potential network or server issues.For example, you might want to add try-catch blocks to
goToPageandonItemPerPageChangeactions if they involve asynchronous operations:@action async goToPage(args: LimitOffset) { try { const { limit, offset } = args; this.limit = limit; this.offset = offset; await this.fetchOrganizationTeams.perform(); } catch (e) { this.notify.error(parseError(e, this.intl.t('errorChangingPage'))); } }This suggestion aims to improve the overall robustness of the component.
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
124-126: Address TODO: Implement project exclusion filterThere's a TODO comment indicating that no filters exist to exclude projects in the backend:
// TODO: No filters exist to exclude projects in the backend // exclude_project: this.args.project?.id,Consider implementing this filter in the backend to improve the efficiency of fetching organization members. Once implemented, update this code to utilize the new filter.
Would you like assistance in creating a GitHub issue to track this TODO item?
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts (1)
59-59: Approve the change with a minor suggestion for clarity.The change from
toArray()toslice()is a good improvement. It reduces dependency on Ember Data internals and aligns with modern JavaScript practices. This change should maintain the same functionality while potentially offering slight performance benefits.For added clarity and type safety, consider using a non-null assertion operator if you're certain
this.projectScenarioswill always be an array when accessed:return this.projectScenarios!.slice();Alternatively, for more explicit null checking:
return this.projectScenarios ? this.projectScenarios.slice() : [];Both alternatives make the intent clearer and could help prevent potential runtime errors.
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1)
62-62: Approved: Good replacement oftoArray()withslice()The change from
toArray()toslice()is a good optimization. Both methods create a new array, preserving immutability, butslice()is a native JavaScript method and might be slightly more efficient.Consider chaining the
slice()andsortBy()methods directly onthis.projectCollaboratorsResponsefor a more concise expression:get projectCollaborators() { return this.projectCollaboratorsResponse?.slice().sortBy('created:desc') ?? []; }This change uses the nullish coalescing operator (
??) instead of the logical OR (||), which is more appropriate when dealing with nullable values.app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts (1)
61-61: Approved: Good replacement of Ember-specific method, with a minor optimization suggestion.The change from
toArray()toslice()is a good move, as it replaces an Ember Data-specific method with a standard JavaScript method. This improves maintainability and flexibility of the code.The addition of
sortBy('created:desc')ensures the list is always sorted by creation date, which is a good practice for consistency.For a minor optimization, consider memoizing the sorted array if it's accessed frequently:
@tracked private _sortedProjectTeamList: ProjectTeamModel[] | null = null; get projectTeamList() { if (!this._sortedProjectTeamList && this.projectTeamListResponse) { this._sortedProjectTeamList = this.projectTeamListResponse.slice().sortBy('created:desc'); } return this._sortedProjectTeamList || []; } // Reset the memoized value when the response changes @action reloadProjectTeamList() { this._sortedProjectTeamList = null; this.getProjectTeamList.perform(); }This approach would cache the sorted array, potentially improving performance for repeated access.
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-324: Consider further modernization and error handling improvementsWhile the change to
slice()is good, there are a few areas in the component that could be further improved:
Error handling: Consider using error codes or types instead of string comparisons for error messages in
setCurrentJiraRepoandfetchJIRAProjectstasks. This would make the error handling more robust and less prone to breaking if error messages change.Consistent reactivity: The component uses a mix of
@trackedproperties and classic Ember computed properties (get syntax). Consider fully adopting the Octane pattern by replacing getters with@trackedproperties where applicable.Async operations: There's a mix of
async/awaitandwaitForPromiseusage. Consider standardizing onasync/awaitfor better readability and consistency.Example of improved error handling:
if (error instanceof NotIntegratedError) { this.noIntegration = true; return; } if (error instanceof IntegrationFailedError) { this.reconnect = true; return; }These changes would further modernize the component and improve its maintainability.
app/models/dynamicscan.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-95: Summary of relationship changes in DynamicscanModelThe changes in this file consistently update
@belongsTodecorators by addinginverse: nulland in some casesasync: true. This appears to be part of a larger effort to optimize or clarify data relationships in the application. Here's a summary of the potential impacts:
- Explicit
inverse: nullrelationships may optimize queries and clarify the data model.- The addition of
async: trueto some relationships changes their loading behavior, which may require updates to existing code.- The
scanParameterGroupsrelationship might need further review to ensure its cardinality is correct.To ensure these changes are applied consistently across the application and to prevent any potential issues, consider the following:
- Create or update documentation explaining the rationale behind these relationship changes.
- Develop a migration guide for updating other models and related code to align with these new patterns.
- Review and update any affected queries, especially those that might have relied on inverse relationships.
- Consider adding integration tests to verify that these changes don't introduce unexpected behavior in data loading or saving operations.
Would you like assistance in creating any of these supporting materials or tests?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts (4 hunks)
- app/models/github-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/jira-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
app/models/jira-repo.ts (1)
14-15: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The update to the
@belongsTodecorator is a good improvement. Making the relationship asynchronous (async: true) can enhance performance, and explicitly settinginverse: nullclarifies the relationship structure.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why
inverse: nullis used, especially if it's not immediately obvious why there's no inverse relationship fromProjectModeltoJiraRepoModel.Please ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact how the
projectproperty is accessed elsewhere in the codebase. Run the following script to find potential usage that might need updating:This script will help identify areas where the
projectproperty is accessed, which might need to be updated to handle the new asynchronous nature of the relationship.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No usages of the
projectproperty found.No occurrences of the
projectproperty were detected in files importingJiraRepoModel, indicating that the change to make the relationship asynchronous does not impact existing code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential usage of the 'project' property in JiraRepoModel that might need updating # Search for files that import JiraRepoModel files_importing_jirarepo=$(rg -l "import.*JiraRepoModel" --type typescript) # For each file, search for usage of the 'project' property for file in $files_importing_jirarepo; do echo "Checking file: $file" rg "jiraRepo.*\.project" "$file" doneLength of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential usage of the 'project' property in JiraRepoModel that might need updating # Search for files that import JiraRepoModel files_importing_jirarepo=$(rg -l "import.*JiraRepoModel" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx") # For each file, search for usage of the 'project' property for file in $files_importing_jirarepo; do echo "Checking file: $file" rg "jiraRepo.*\.project" "$file" doneLength of output: 478
app/models/scan-parameter.ts (2)
22-22: LGTM! Appropriate use of async and inverse options.The changes to the
@belongsTodecorator forlastUpdatedByare well-considered:
async: trueenables lazy loading of the related user, which can improve performance.inverse: nullcorrectly indicates that there's no inverse relationship on the User model.These changes align with best practices for defining Ember Data relationships.
22-25: Summary: Changes improve relationship definitionsThe modifications to both
@belongsTodecorators enhance the model's relationship definitions:
- They explicitly define relationships as asynchronous, which can improve performance through lazy loading.
- They clarify the inverse relationship status, aiding in understanding the model's connections.
These changes contribute to a more robust and performant data model. Great work on refining these relationships!
app/models/github-repo.ts (1)
34-35: LGTM! Consider verifying the inverse relationship decision.The update to the
@belongsTodecorator looks good. Theasync: trueoption is a good practice for performance, allowing lazy loading of the relatedProjectModel.However, I'd like to draw attention to the
inverse: nulloption:
- If this is intentional (i.e.,
ProjectModeldoesn't need to referenceGithubRepoModel), then this is correct.- If
ProjectModelshould have a reference toGithubRepoModel, you might want to define an inverse relationship.To ensure consistency, let's check if
ProjectModelhas any references toGithubRepoModel:If these searches return results, you might want to reconsider the
inverse: nulloption.✅ Verification successful
Verified: The
inverse: nulloption is correctly set as there are no references toGithubRepoModelinProjectModel.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential inverse relationships in ProjectModel # Test: Search for GithubRepoModel in project model file echo "Searching for GithubRepoModel in ProjectModel:" fd --type file --extension ts --extension js "project.ts" --exec rg --type typescript "GithubRepoModel" # Test: Search for github-repo in project model file echo "Searching for 'github-repo' in ProjectModel:" fd --type file --extension ts --extension js "project.ts" --exec rg --type typescript "github-repo"Length of output: 2927
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential inverse relationships in ProjectModel # Test: Search for GithubRepoModel in project model file echo "Searching for GithubRepoModel in ProjectModel:" fd --type file --extension ts --extension js "project.ts" --exec rg "GithubRepoModel" # Test: Search for 'github-repo' in project model file echo "Searching for 'github-repo' in ProjectModel:" fd --type file --extension ts --extension js "project.ts" --exec rg "github-repo"Length of output: 371
app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts (4)
32-33: LGTM: Improved relationship definition forproject.The changes to the
@belongsTodecorator for theprojectrelationship are beneficial:
- Adding
async: trueallows for more efficient data loading, especially useful for large datasets or remote data fetching.- Setting
inverse: nullexplicitly declares that there's no inverse relationship on theProjectModel, which can help prevent potential issues with bidirectional relationships.These changes align with modern Ember Data best practices for defining relationships.
35-36: LGTM: EnhancedlastUpdatedByrelationship with proper null handling.The changes to the
@belongsTodecorator for thelastUpdatedByrelationship are well-implemented:
- Adding
async: trueandinverse: nullaligns with the changes made to theprojectrelationship, maintaining consistency.- The type declaration
AsyncBelongsTo<UserModel> | nullcorrectly allows for null values, which is important for cases where thelastUpdatedByinformation might not be available.This change improves both the relationship definition and type safety of the
lastUpdatedByproperty.
38-39: LGTM: OptimizedscanParametersrelationship with async loading.The addition of
async: trueto the@hasManydecorator for thescanParametersrelationship is a positive change:
- It allows for more efficient loading of related
ScanParameterModelinstances, which is particularly beneficial forhasManyrelationships that could potentially contain a large number of records.- This change is consistent with the async loading strategy applied to the
@belongsTorelationships in this model.- The
inverseoption is correctly retained, maintaining the bidirectional relationship withScanParameterModel.This modification improves the overall performance and consistency of relationship handling in the
ScanParameterGroupModel.
32-39: Summary: Improved relationship handling inScanParameterGroupModelThe changes made to this file consistently enhance the relationship definitions in the
ScanParameterGroupModel:
- All relationships now use async loading, which can improve performance, especially for large datasets.
- The
@belongsTorelationships explicitly setinverse: null, clarifying the absence of inverse relationships.- Proper null handling is implemented for the
lastUpdatedByrelationship.- The
@hasManyrelationship retains its inverse definition while adding async loading.These modifications align with modern Ember Data best practices and should result in more efficient and maintainable code.
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
16-18: LGTM: NewLimitOffsetinterface looks good.The new
LimitOffsetinterface is well-defined and appropriately typed for pagination purposes. It's a good practice to have this interface for better type safety when handling pagination parameters.app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1)
70-70: Approve: Efficient array copying withslice()The change from
toArray()toslice()is a good optimization.slice()creates a shallow copy of the array, which is typically more efficient thantoArray(), especially for large arrays. This change maintains the same functionality (creating a copy for non-destructive sorting) while potentially improving performance.The rest of the getter's logic remains intact, ensuring that the behavior is preserved. This update aligns well with modern JavaScript practices.
app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-162: Overall impact: Minimal and positiveThe change from
toArray()toslice()in theprojectCollaboratorsgetter is a localized optimization that doesn't affect the overall functionality of the component. It aligns with modern JavaScript practices and may offer a slight performance improvement. The change is minimal, clear, and maintains the existing behavior of the component.app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts (2)
82-82: Approved: Good improvement using native JavaScript methodThe change from
toArray()toslice()is a good improvement. It maintains the same functionality of creating a shallow copy of the array while using a native JavaScript method instead of an Ember Data specific one. This change likely improves performance slightly and aligns the code more closely with standard JavaScript practices.The use of the optional chaining operator (
?.) is also appropriate here, correctly handling cases wherevulnerabilityListResponsemight be null or undefined.
82-82: Verify component functionality after the changeWhile the change to use
slice()instead oftoArray()is isolated and should maintain the same behavior, it's important to verify that all parts of the component that rely on thevulnerabilityPreferencesgetter still function as expected. This includes any templates or child components that might be iterating over or otherwise using this data.To help with verification, you can run the following script to find usages of
vulnerabilityPreferenceswithin the component and its template:Please review the output to ensure all usages of
vulnerabilityPreferencesare still valid with the new implementation.app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1)
92-92: Approve the change fromtoArray()toslice()The modification from
toArray()toslice()is a good improvement. This change:
- Maintains the creation of a new array, preventing unintended mutations of the original data.
- Moves towards using standard JavaScript methods (
slice()) instead of Ember Data-specific APIs (toArray()).- Potentially offers a slight performance improvement as
slice()is a native JavaScript method.The change aligns with modern JavaScript practices and reduces the dependency on Ember Data-specific methods, which is beneficial for long-term maintainability and potential future migration efforts.
app/models/dynamicscan.ts (4)
28-29: LGTM. Consistent approach for user relationships.The addition of
inverse: nullto thestoppedByUserrelationship is consistent with the previous user relationship changes. This maintains a uniform approach to defining user relationships in theDynamicscanModel.
94-95: LGTM. Verify impact of asynchronous loading foravailableDevice.The addition of
async: trueandinverse: nullto theavailableDevicerelationship is consistent with the changes made to other relationships in this model. This change clarifies the relationship definition and makes it asynchronous.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify that existing code handles the asynchronous nature of this relationship correctly. You can use the following script to identify potential areas that might need attention:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of the availableDevice relationship rg --type typescript --type javascript "availableDevice" app/This will help identify any code that might need to be updated to handle the asynchronous loading of the
availableDevicerelationship.
41-42: Verify relationship cardinality and asynchronous loading forscanParameterGroups.The
scanParameterGroupsrelationship has been updated to be both asynchronous and explicitly without an inverse. However, there are a couple of points that need clarification:
- The property name
scanParameterGroupssuggests a potential many-to-many relationship, but it's defined as a singlebelongsTorelationship. Is this intentional, or should it be ahasManyrelationship instead?- The addition of
async: trueimplies that this relationship will now be loaded asynchronously. Please confirm if this change in loading behavior is intentional and doesn't negatively impact any existing code that might assume synchronous loading.To help verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script to check for any uses of this relationship:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of the scanParameterGroups relationship rg --type typescript --type javascript "scanParameterGroups" app/This will help identify any code that might be affected by the change to asynchronous loading or the potential mismatch in relationship cardinality.
15-16: Verify the intention behind addinginverse: nullto thefilerelationship.The addition of
inverse: nullto thefilerelationship explicitly states that there is no inverse relationship defined on thefilemodel. While this can help optimize queries and clarify the data model, it's important to ensure this change aligns with the intended application behavior.Please confirm:
- Is this change part of a larger effort to optimize or clarify data relationships?
- Have you verified that removing the inverse relationship won't negatively impact any existing queries or data operations?
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script to check for any direct references to the inverse relationship:
This will help identify any code that might be affected by this change.
✅ Verification successful
No issues found with adding
inverse: nullto thefilerelationship.The search confirmed that there are no existing references to the inverse relationship for
file.dynamicscanin the codebase. Therefore, addinginverse: nulldoes not adversely affect any current queries or data operations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential uses of the inverse relationship rg --type typescript --type javascript "file\.dynamicscan" app/Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential uses of the inverse relationship in TypeScript files rg "file\.dynamicscan" --type ts --type tsx app/Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential uses of the inverse relationship in TypeScript files using glob patterns rg "file\.dynamicscan" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" app/Length of output: 50
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 05m 54s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Sam David |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
22
|
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1545-fix-project-settings-deprecation
branch
from
7117c9a to
6d6bc6b
Compare
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
f82bec3
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://249abc60.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pd-1545-fix-project-settings.irenestaging.pages.dev |
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1545-fix-project-settings-deprecation
branch
from
6d6bc6b to
9c55ecf
Compare
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1545-fix-project-settings-deprecation
branch
from
9c55ecf to
8efeb6d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/file-list/index.ts (2)
97-97: Approved: Consistent use ofslice()for immutabilityThe addition of
slice()after sorting is consistent with the previous change and ensures immutability of the returned sorted array. This is a good practice to prevent unintended side effects.Consider memoizing this getter if it's called frequently, as sorting and slicing large arrays can be computationally expensive:
@cached get sortedFiles() { const sortProperties = ['createdOn:desc']; return this.filesResponse?.sortBy(...sortProperties).slice(); }This optimization would prevent unnecessary re-computations when the underlying data hasn't changed.
Line range hint
1-1: Consider refactoring away from observersThe component currently uses an observer pattern for
FileCounter, which is generally discouraged in modern Ember applications. Consider refactoring this to use autotracking:
Remove the observer-related code:
- Delete lines 1, 114-116, and 181-184
- Remove the
observeFileCountermethodInstead, create a tracked property for
FileCounter:@tracked fileCounter = this.realtime.FileCounter;Use a getter that depends on
fileCounterto trigger updates:get shouldReloadFiles() { return this.fileCounter; }In the template, use
{{this.shouldReloadFiles}}in a strategic location to trigger re-renders when needed.This approach leverages Ember's autotracking system, making the code more predictable and easier to maintain.
Also applies to: 114-116, 181-184
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
36-38: Typo in property name and inconsistent use ofhtmlSafe.There's a typo in the property name
'descriptionUnescapedd'; it should be'descriptionUnescaped'. Additionally, unlike other branches in thevulnerabilityDescriptiongetter, this return value isn't wrapped withhtmlSafe, which might lead to rendering issues or XSS vulnerabilities.Apply this diff to fix the typo and ensure consistent use of
htmlSafe:- return this.vulnerability?.get?.('descriptionUnescapedd'); + return htmlSafe(this.vulnerability?.get?.('descriptionUnescaped') || '');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-list/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts (4 hunks)
- app/models/github-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/jira-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts
- app/models/github-repo.ts
- app/models/jira-repo.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/components/file-list/index.ts (2)
87-87: Approved: Good use ofslice()for immutabilityThe change from
toArray()toslice()is a good practice. It creates a shallow copy of the array, maintaining immutability and preventing accidental modifications to the original data. This approach is more idiomatic in modern JavaScript/TypeScript.
Line range hint
1-214: Summary: Positive changes with room for further improvementsThe changes in this file improve the immutability of the
filesandsortedFilesgetters, which is a positive step. These modifications enhance data integrity and reduce the risk of unintended side effects.Consider the following suggestions for further improvements:
- Memoize the
sortedFilesgetter for performance optimization.- Refactor the observer pattern to use Ember's autotracking system.
- Review the use of
anytypes (e.g., in theparseErrorimport) and replace with more specific types where possible.Overall, the changes are beneficial, and implementing these suggestions would further modernize and optimize the component.
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (2)
4-4: Appropriate use of type-only import forIntlService.Using
import typeforIntlServiceoptimizes the build by removing unnecessary imports at runtime since it's used purely for type annotations.
7-7: Appropriate use of type-only import forAnalysisModel.Similarly, importing
AnalysisModelas a type-only import enhances build performance by excluding it from the runtime bundle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (1)
Incomplete removal of
regulatoryContentgetterThe
regulatoryContentgetter has been removed from theFileCompareAnalysisDetailsComponent. However, references toregulatoryContentstill exist in the codebase. Please address the following:
Integration Tests:
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.jsComponent Files:
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.tsHandlebars Templates:
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/regulatory-content/index.hbsapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/regulatory-content/hipaa/index.hbsapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/regulatory-content/nist/index.hbsapp/components/file-compare/analysis-details/regulatory-content/index.hbsEnsure that all references to
regulatoryContentare removed or appropriately updated to prevent potential issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-71: Verify impact of removedregulatoryContentgetterThe
regulatoryContentgetter has been removed from theFileCompareAnalysisDetailsComponent. Please ensure that:
- All references to
this.regulatoryContentwithin this component have been removed or updated.- Any external code that may have been using
regulatoryContenthas been appropriately modified.- The removal of this getter doesn't cause any unintended side effects in the application.
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script to check for any remaining references to
regulatoryContent:If any references are found, please update them accordingly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to regulatoryContent in the codebase # Search for regulatoryContent in TypeScript and JavaScript files echo "Searching for regulatoryContent references:" rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,js}' --type ts 'regulatoryContent' -C 3 # Search for regulatoryContent in template files echo "Searching for regulatoryContent in templates:" rg --type-add 'hbs:*.hbs' --type hbs 'regulatoryContent' -C 3Length of output: 38004
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-list/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts (4 hunks)
- app/models/github-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/jira-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- app/components/file-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts
- app/models/github-repo.ts
- app/models/jira-repo.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (2)
4-4: Improved type safety with type-only importsThe changes to import statements for
IntlServiceandAnalysisModelas type-only imports enhance type safety without affecting runtime behavior. This aligns with TypeScript best practices for imports that are only used for type information.Also applies to: 7-7
Line range hint
1-71: Summary of changes
- Import statements for
IntlServiceandAnalysisModelhave been updated to type-only imports, improving type safety.- The
regulatoryContentgetter has been removed from the component.These changes appear to be part of a cleanup and type safety improvement effort. The removal of the
regulatoryContentgetter is the most significant change and requires careful verification to ensure it doesn't negatively impact the application's functionality.Please ensure all necessary adjustments have been made throughout the codebase to accommodate these changes.
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1545-fix-project-settings-deprecation
branch
from
8efeb6d to
f82bec3
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-list/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts (4 hunks)
- app/models/github-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/jira-repo.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts (1 hunks)
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- app/components/file-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/vulnerability-list/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-collaborator/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/add-project-team/table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/collaborators-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/dynamicscan-automation-settings/scenario/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/jira-project/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/general-settings/project-team-table/index.ts
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.ts
- app/models/dynamicscan.ts
- app/models/github-repo.ts
- app/models/jira-repo.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter-group.ts
- app/models/scan-parameter.ts
🧰 Additional context used
future-pirate-king
deleted the
PD-1545-fix-project-settings-deprecation
branch
No description provided.