added vulnerable api request response download raw button #1504
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (16)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (15)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
b9f4565
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://28591ba8.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://api-req-res-download-raw.irenestaging.pages.dev |
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
api-req-res-download-raw
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 05m 05s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Avi Shah |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
32
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (3)
15-15: Uselocal-classInstead ofclassfor ConsistencyTo maintain consistency throughout the component, consider using
local-class='mt-4'instead ofclass='mt-4'.
19-19: Avoid Inline Styles for Better MaintainabilityUsing inline styles like
{{style flex='1'}}can make the code less maintainable and harder to read. Consider moving this style to a CSS class.
22-22: Replace Inline Styles with CSS ClassesThe inline style
{{style maxWidth='400px'}}in<AkTypography>can be moved to a CSS class to improve maintainability and consistency.app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-1:⚠️ PR changes don't match stated objectiveThe PR title indicates adding a "vulnerable api request response download raw button", but the changes reviewed focus on UI improvements (dividers, styling) without implementing the download functionality. This suggests either:
- The download functionality implementation is missing
- The PR is incomplete
- The PR title needs updating to reflect its actual scope
Please either:
- Add the missing download functionality implementation
- Update the PR title to reflect the current changes
- Clarify if this PR is a prerequisite for the download functionality
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (1)
857-877: Consider extracting repeated header assertions into a shared helper function.The header assertions are duplicated across multiple test cases. Consider extracting these into a shared helper function to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
+ // Add at the top of the file + function assertHeaderElements(assert, container, analysis) { + assert + .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-headerSummaryValue]') + .hasText(analysis.vulnerability.get('name')); + + assert.dom( + `[data-test-analysisRiskTag-root='${getRiskStatusObj(analysis.computedRisk, analysis.status, analysis.isOverriddenRisk).label}']` + ); + + const container = document.querySelector( + '[data-test-analysisDetails-headerSummaryContainer]' + ); + + analysis.vulnerabilityTypes.forEach((vt, i) => { + assert + .dom( + container.querySelectorAll( + '[data-test-vulnerability-analysis-scanTypeTag]' + )[i] + ) + .hasText(t(vulnerabilityTypeTextMap[vt])); + }); + } // Use in test cases - assert - .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-headerSummaryValue]') - .hasText(analysis.vulnerability.get('name')); - // ... rest of duplicated assertions + assertHeaderElements(assert, container, analysis);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss(2 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(1 hunks)tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js(3 hunks)translations/en.json(1 hunks)translations/ja.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- translations/en.json
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (16)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
28-28: AkDivider Usage with @direction='vertical' Is Correct
The AkDivider component is correctly utilized with the @direction='vertical' and @color='dark' arguments.
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs (2)
2-9: Conditional Rendering for Vertical Divider Implemented Correctly
The conditional check {{#if this.isVertical}} correctly handles the rendering of the vertical divider with appropriate attributes and classes.
11-21: Horizontal Divider Rendering Maintains Flexibility
Using {{let (element (or @tag 'hr')) as |Tag|}} allows for customizable tag elements, and the applied classes ensure consistent styling for horizontal dividers.
app/components/ak-divider/index.ts (2)
9-9: Addition of direction Argument Enhances Component Flexibility
Introducing the optional direction argument allows the AkDivider component to support both horizontal and vertical orientations.
15-17: Getter isVertical Accurately Determines Divider Orientation
The computed property isVertical correctly assesses the divider's orientation based on the direction argument provided.
app/components/ak-divider/index.scss (3)
24-28: Vertical Divider Styles Implemented Appropriately
The .ak-divider-direction-vertical class sets the width and alignment suitable for a vertical divider, ensuring it stretches appropriately within its container.
30-32: Light Theme Color Applied Correctly for Vertical Divider
The .ak-divider-vertical-color-light class applies the light theme color using background-color, which is appropriate for the vertical divider.
34-36: Dark Theme Color Applied Correctly for Vertical Divider
The .ak-divider-vertical-color-dark class applies the dark theme color correctly, ensuring consistency with the application's styling guidelines.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs (1)
4-4: LGTM, but seems unrelated to PR objective
The addition of the vertical divider improves UI separation, but appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adding a vulnerable API request response download button.
Let's verify if this file should contain download-related changes:
✅ Verification successful
Cosmetic change is correctly placed, download functionality is properly implemented elsewhere
The download functionality is appropriately implemented in the findings component with a dedicated download button, raw text handling, and file generation logic. The vertical divider addition in edit-analysis-button is a valid UI enhancement that doesn't need to contain download-related changes, as that functionality is correctly placed in its own component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if download functionality exists elsewhere in the component
rg -l "download" app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/
Length of output: 231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of findings component to understand download implementation
rg -A 5 "download" app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.{hbs,ts}
Length of output: 3258
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (1)
56-74: LGTM, but unrelated to PR objective
The addition of vertical divider stories improves component documentation but appears unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adding a vulnerable API request response download button.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (1)
34-34: Missing styles for download functionality
While the styling changes improve the UI, there appear to be no styles related to the PR's stated objective of adding a vulnerable API request response download button. This suggests either:
- The download functionality is missing styles
- The download functionality is implemented elsewhere
- The PR title might not accurately reflect its current scope
Let's verify the implementation of download functionality:
Also applies to: 70-76, 80-86, 91-92
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (1)
43-43: LGTM! Layout adjustments maintain consistency
The height and position adjustments maintain the existing styling patterns and improve the overall layout.
Also applies to: 105-105
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (2)
201-221: LGTM! Header assertions are well structured.
The assertions comprehensively verify critical UI elements including the header summary value, risk tag, and vulnerability type tags.
933-953: Same header assertions duplication as noted above.
translations/ja.json (1)
373-373: LGTM! Translation addition is clean and follows conventions.
The new translation key-value pair is properly formatted and consistent with the file's structure.
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1)
1118-1120: LGTM! CSS variable addition follows conventions.
The new border color variable is properly defined and follows the existing naming pattern.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
cbb6c51 to
21d44f1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts (1)
67-72:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and size limits for raw text generation
The
apiFindingsRawPayloadgetter concatenates all finding descriptions without validation or size limits.As mentioned in a previous review, consider adding:
- Size limits for the concatenated text
- Sanitization of finding descriptions
- Filtering of sensitive data
get apiFindingsRawPayload() { + const MAX_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB limit + let totalSize = 0; return this.analysis.findings .map((finding) => finding.description) .filter(Boolean) + .filter(desc => { + totalSize += desc.length; + return totalSize <= MAX_SIZE; + }) + .map(desc => this.sanitizeDescription(desc)) .join('\n'); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (1)
Line range hint
1-1504: Test coverage looks comprehensive, consider adding negative test cases for API findings.The test suite provides thorough coverage of the vulnerability analysis details component, particularly for the new vulnerable API request/response feature. However, consider adding negative test cases to verify the component's behavior when:
- The API response is malformed
- The request/response data is empty
- The confidence level is missing
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (2)
71-74: Consider adding more story variantsWhile the current args are good defaults, consider adding more variants to demonstrate different use cases:
- Different colors (light/dark)
- Different heights
- Different spacings
Example addition:
export const VerticalLight = VerticalTemplate.bind({}); VerticalLight.args = { color: 'light', direction: 'vertical', };
60-60: Consider making the height configurableThe hardcoded height of 200px in the style attribute could be made configurable through story args for better flexibility in testing different scenarios.
-<div {{style height="200px"}} class="flex-row flex-align-center flex-justify-space-around p-3 w-full m-3"> +<div {{style height=this.height}} class="flex-row flex-align-center flex-justify-space-around p-3 w-full m-3">Then add to args:
Vertical.args = { color: 'dark', direction: 'vertical', height: '200px' };app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts (1)
114-116: Remove debug console.log statementsDebug console.log statements should be removed before merging.
- console.log(timestamp); - console.log(analysisId);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss(3 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(1 hunks)tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js(3 hunks)translations/en.json(3 hunks)translations/ja.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.ts
- app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs
- translations/en.json
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.scss
- translations/ja.json
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (1)
Line range hint 1-1504: Regulatory compliance test coverage is thorough and well-structured.
The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of various regulatory standards and their rendering. The helper functions for asserting regulatory content (assertPcidssValue, assertHipaaValue, assertSamaValue) are well-designed and promote code reuse.
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (2)
56-67: LGTM: Well-structured story template implementation
The vertical divider story template is well implemented with:
- Clear demonstration of the component's vertical orientation
- Good use of flex layout for spacing
- Appropriate test content (A/B labels) to show divider context
Line range hint 1-74: Verify PR objective alignment
The PR title mentions "vulnerable api request response download raw button" but this file only contains divider component stories. This seems to be a potential mismatch between the PR objective and the changes.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that this PR includes both the divider component changes and vulnerability analysis related changes. Let me verify if these changes are related by checking the actual content of vulnerability analysis files.
PR changes are correctly aligned with its objective
The search results reveal that the AkDivider component is actively used within the vulnerability analysis details components, with multiple instances found in files like vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs and vulnerable-api/index.hbs. The changes to the divider component are part of the UI implementation for the vulnerable API request response download functionality, making them relevant to the PR's objective.
- The divider is used to separate sections in the vulnerability analysis UI
- Multiple files in the
vulnerability-analysis-detailsdirectory use the AkDivider component - The PR includes both the divider component updates and the vulnerability analysis feature files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files related to the vulnerable API download functionality
echo "Searching for related download button files..."
rg -l "download.*raw.*button|vulnerable.*api"
echo "Searching for related PR files..."
gh pr view 1504 --json files -q '.files[].path'
Length of output: 1658
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if divider component is used in vulnerability analysis files
echo "Checking usage of AkDivider in vulnerability analysis files..."
rg -A 2 "AkDivider" "app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/"
# Check the PR description for context
echo "Checking PR description..."
gh pr view 1504 --json body -q '.body'
Length of output: 2075
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (3)
105-105: LGTM - Coordinated position adjustment.
The top position adjustment (40px reduction) correctly corresponds to the header height change, maintaining the proper sticky positioning of the title container.
191-194: LGTM - Clean flex container implementation.
The new summary container uses standard flex patterns for content expansion. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.
43-43: Verify the reduced header height impact on content visibility.
The header container height has been reduced by 40px. While this aligns with the layout updates mentioned in the summary, we should verify that all header content remains visible and properly aligned.
✅ Verification successful
Height reduction in header container appears safe and well-structured
The reduced height of 90px is appropriate for the header content which consists of:
- A breadcrumb trail component
- An AkStack component with proper spacing and alignment
The layout uses flexbox with space-between justification, ensuring content is properly distributed. The sticky positioning and z-index handling remain intact, and there are no overflow concerns as the content structure is simple and well-organized.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any height-dependent elements or potential overflow issues in the header
rg -l "analysis-details-header" | xargs rg "height|min-height|max-height|overflow"
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full context of the header section and its content structure
rg -A 10 "analysis-details-header" app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss
Length of output: 1062
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check what content is being rendered in the header container
rg -l "analysis-details-header-container" | xargs rg -B 2 -A 5 "<div.*analysis-details-header-container"
Length of output: 905
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the complete header content structure including the AkStack component
rg -B 3 -A 10 "analysis-details-header-container" app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs
Length of output: 555
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts (1)
31-31: LGTM! Good practice using the window service.
Using the browser/window service instead of directly accessing the global window object improves testability.
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
21d44f1 to
21d167a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts (2)
67-72:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and size limits for raw text generation
The
apiFindingsRawPayloadgetter concatenates all finding descriptions without validation or size limits, which could lead to memory issues with large datasets and potentially expose sensitive information.Apply this diff to add size limits and sanitization:
get apiFindingsRawPayload() { + const MAX_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB limit + let totalSize = 0; return this.analysis.findings .map((finding) => finding.description) .filter(Boolean) + .filter(desc => { + totalSize += desc.length; + return totalSize <= MAX_SIZE; + }) + .map(desc => this.sanitizeDescription(desc)) .join('\n'); }
100-121:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and type safety
The download implementation needs improvements in error handling and type safety:
- No error handling for blob creation or download failures
- Memory leak potential if URL.revokeObjectURL isn't called on error
- No type safety for analysisId
Apply this diff to improve error handling and type safety:
downloadApiFindingsPayload = task(async () => { + let objectUrl: string | null = null; + try { + if (!this.apiFindingsRawPayload) { + throw new Error('No content available for download'); + } + + const analysisId = this.analysis.id; + if (!analysisId) { + throw new Error('Analysis ID is required'); + } + // Create a Blob with the raw text const blob = new Blob([this.apiFindingsRawPayload], { type: 'text/plain' }); // Create a download link const link = window.document.createElement('a'); - link.href = URL.createObjectURL(blob); + objectUrl = URL.createObjectURL(blob); + link.href = objectUrl; - const analysisId = this.analysis.id; - // Generate a filename const timestamp = new Date().getTime(); link.download = `analysis_api_findings_${analysisId}_${timestamp}.txt`; // Append to body, click, and remove window.document.body.appendChild(link); link.click(); window.document.body.removeChild(link); // Clean up the URL object - URL.revokeObjectURL(link.href); + if (objectUrl) { + URL.revokeObjectURL(objectUrl); + } + } catch (error) { + this.notify.error(this.intl.t('errors.downloadFailed')); + console.error('Download failed:', error); + } finally { + if (objectUrl) { + URL.revokeObjectURL(objectUrl); + } + } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss(3 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(1 hunks)tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js(3 hunks)translations/en.json(3 hunks)translations/ja.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js
- app/components/ak-divider/index.ts
- app/components/ak-divider/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs
- tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js
- translations/en.json
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts (1)
31-31: LGTM! Using browser service injection
The window service declaration follows Ember's best practices for accessing browser APIs.
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
api-req-res-download-raw
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 15m 44s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Avi Shah |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
|
Failures
|
1
|
|
Flaky
|
0
|
|
Pending
|
0
|
|
Skipped
|
0
|
|
Passing
|
31
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Tests for review
cypress/tests/dynamic-scan.spec.ts • 1 failed test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Scan > it tests dynamic scan for an apk file: 58062 |
Test Replay
Screenshots
|
|
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
21d167a to
40ba529
Compare
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
40ba529 to
b5be86f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (1)
56-67: Consider making the layout more flexibleThe vertical divider implementation looks good, but consider these improvements:
- The fixed height of 200px might be too restrictive for different content sizes
- The
gutterBottomprop on Typography components might cause uneven spacing in a vertical layoutConsider this more flexible approach:
- <div {{style height="200px"}} class="flex-row flex-align-center flex-justify-space-around p-3 w-full m-3"> + <div class="flex-row flex-align-center flex-justify-space-around p-3 w-full m-3" style="min-height: 100px"> <AkTypography @color="textSecondary" @gutterBottom={{true}}>A</AkTypography> <AkDivider @color={{this.color}} @direction={{this.direction}} @variant={{this.variant}} /> <AkTypography @color="textSecondary" @gutterBottom={{true}}>B</AkTypography> </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss(3 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(1 hunks)tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js(1 hunks)translations/en.json(3 hunks)translations/ja.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss
- translations/ja.json
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss
- translations/en.json
- app/components/ak-divider/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (2)
69-75: LGTM!
The story configuration is well-structured with appropriate default arguments that demonstrate the vertical divider functionality.
Line range hint 1-75: Verify alignment with PR objectives
The changes in this file appear to be implementing a vertical divider story, which seems unrelated to the PR title "added vulnerable api request response download raw button". Please clarify if these changes should be in a separate PR.
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
b5be86f to
c23b991
Compare
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
c23b991 to
ffd5482
Compare
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
api-req-res-download-raw
branch
from
ffd5482 to
b9f4565
Compare
|
No description provided.