Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: datepicker3 test fix #39019

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu commented Feb 4, 2025

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13163657051
Commit: 33f041b
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Wed, 05 Feb 2025 18:41:54 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Cypress test for the DatePicker widget. It enhances the test's robustness by adding error handling and control flow logic. Specifically, it checks the calendar's state before clicking to set the maximum date and updates the click action with a true parameter, ensuring the calendar is open before proceeding.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/.../Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts Added a check to verify if the calendar is open before interaction. Updated the calendar header click action to include a true parameter.
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt Updated test specifications to reference DatePicker3_spec.ts and uncommented the path for Anvil/Widgets/*, activating it for test execution.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Runner
    participant C as Calendar Widget
    T->>C: Check if calendar is open
    alt Calendar is closed
        T->>C: Click header to open (retry)
    end
    T->>C: Click header with flag (true)
    T->>C: Set maximum date
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • sagar-qa007

Poem

In the realm of DatePicker, the tests now sing,
With smart checks ensuring the calendar's in swing.
A click with true paves the way so bright,
Errors handled with graceful might.
Code and tests dance in harmonious cheer!
🎉 Happy testing day!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4441e00 and 90b7a7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (2)

2-2: Update Test Spec Reference to DatePicker3_spec.ts

The updated spec now points to the TypeScript file for Datepicker3 which aligns with the PR objective and the enhancements described in the AI summary. Ensure that the referenced spec file adheres to Cypress best practices and uses proper data-* attributes for selectors.


5-5: Confirm Intentional Commenting of Anvil Widgets Tests

The test spec for Regression/ClientSide/Anvil/Widgets remains commented out (note the '#' prefix). Please verify that this exclusion is intentional for the limited test run, ensuring that only DatePicker3_spec.ts is executed.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Test labels Feb 4, 2025
@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=30 update_snapshot=true
cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts (1)

25-27: Remove afterEach hook as per guidelines

The coding guidelines specifically mention avoiding after and afterEach in test cases. Consider moving the navigation logic into individual test cases or use a different approach for cleanup.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts (1)

258-265: Improve calendar state handling with cy.should

While the state check is a good addition, consider using Cypress's built-in assertions for better reliability:

-      agHelper.GetNClick(datePickerlocators.calendarHeader, 2, true);
-      agHelper
-        .GetAttribute(datePickerlocators.calendarHeader, "data-state", 2)
-        .then((state) => {
-          if (state === "closed") {
-            agHelper.GetNClick(datePickerlocators.calendarHeader, 2, true);
-          }
-        });
+      cy.get(datePickerlocators.calendarHeader)
+        .eq(2)
+        .should('have.attr', 'data-state')
+        .then((state) => {
+          if (state === "closed") {
+            agHelper.GetNClick(datePickerlocators.calendarHeader, 2, true);
+          }
+        });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1de2408 and 4441e00.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Datepicker/DatePicker3_spec.ts (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count= 50

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13141620422.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 5 Total Passed: 5 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=50

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13150132168.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 250 Total Passed: 250 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Feb 5, 2025
@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants