Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: checkout the base branch instead of release in cyclic deps check #39057

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dvj1988
Copy link
Contributor

@dvj1988 dvj1988 commented Feb 6, 2025

Description

The CI workflow for cyclic dependency checks has been modified to reference the base branch instead of the release branch.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Warning

Tests have not run on the HEAD fb993f8 yet


Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:37:50 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the automated cyclic dependency check to now use the pull request’s target branch for comparisons.
    • Updated naming and output labels in the workflow to provide clearer, more accurate results.
    • Added a new step to log circular dependencies found in the pull request.
  • Documentation
    • Added comment line to the Faro tracing system initialization code for clarity.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@dvj1988 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebd2e77 and fb993f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

The CI workflow for cyclic dependency checks has been modified to reference the base branch instead of the release branch. This change affects the checkout step, naming of subsequent steps, output variables, and file naming for dependency reports. The cyclic dependency count and comparison now refer to the pull request's base branch, with the generated comment message updated accordingly.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
.github/workflows/ci-...-cyclic-deps-check.yml - Updated checkout step from "Checkout release branch" to "Checkout base branch" using ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}.
- Renamed step from "Count circular dependencies on release branch" to "Count circular dependencies on base branch".
- Changed output variable from release_count to base_branch_count.
- Renamed dependency report file to base_branch_circular_deps.txt.
- Added a step to log differences in circular dependencies between PR and base branch.
app/client/src/instrumentation/.../index.ts - Added a comment line at the beginning of the file without affecting existing functionality or logic.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: Add worklow to check cyclic deps in a PR #33197: The changes in the main PR enhance the existing cyclic dependency check workflow, while the retrieved PR introduces the initial version of that workflow; thus, they are related as they both modify the same workflow file.
  • chore: make cyclic deps check an error #38543: The changes in the main PR enhance the cyclic dependency check workflow by modifying the logic for counting dependencies and updating output variables, while the retrieved PR also modifies the cyclic dependency check workflow but focuses on making it a mandatory error check; thus, they are related through their shared focus on the same workflow file and its functionality.

Suggested labels

ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • sharat87
  • riodeuno
  • mohanarpit

Poem

In the realm of code and CI delight,
A branch reborn in a brand new light.
Dependencies once tangled now sing,
With names and clues that clarity bring.
Code flows like a stream so bright—
Cheers to progress in our digital night!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Feb 6, 2025
@dvj1988 dvj1988 changed the base branch from release to master February 6, 2025 07:07
@dvj1988 dvj1988 changed the base branch from master to release February 6, 2025 07:09
@dvj1988 dvj1988 marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 07:18
@dvj1988 dvj1988 requested a review from sharat87 as a code owner February 6, 2025 07:18
@dvj1988 dvj1988 requested review from riodeuno and KelvinOm February 6, 2025 07:26
@dvj1988 dvj1988 added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Feb 6, 2025
@dvj1988 dvj1988 enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2025 07:28
KelvinOm
KelvinOm previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ jobs:
github-token: ${{secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN}}
script: |
const prNumber = context.payload.pull_request.number;
const message = `🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:\n\nThis PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by ${{steps.compare-deps.outputs.diff}}, when compared with the release branch.\n\nRefer [this document](https://appsmith.notion.site/How-to-check-cyclic-dependencies-c47b08fe5f2f4261a3a234b19e13f2db) to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.`;
const message = `🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:\n\nThis PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by ${{steps.compare-deps.outputs.diff}}, when compared with the ${{github.event.pull_request.base.ref}} branch.\n\nRefer [this document](https://appsmith.notion.site/How-to-check-cyclic-dependencies-c47b08fe5f2f4261a3a234b19e13f2db) to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.`;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dvj1988 Can we also list the new added cyclic dependencies? Maybe not in the message, but at least in the log.

@dvj1988 dvj1988 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

106-121: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Portability Concerns in Log Circular Dependencies Step
The inline sed -i '' commands on lines 110 and 111 use syntax that is typical on macOS but may fail on Ubuntu (the workflow’s runtime). In GNU sed (default on Ubuntu), the correct usage is simply sed -i. Additionally, ensure that the logging clearly shows both removed and added dependencies as requested in previous review feedback.

Diff suggestions:

-          sed -i '' '10,14d' pr_circular_deps.txt
+          sed -i '10,14d' pr_circular_deps.txt
-          sed -i '' '20,29d' base_branch_circular_deps.txt
+          sed -i '20,29d' base_branch_circular_deps.txt
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

58-60: Trailing Whitespace & Command Formatting in Dependency Count (PR branch)
There are extra trailing spaces on line 58 that could lead to formatting inconsistencies. Please remove these trailing spaces to improve readability and maintainability.

Diff suggestion:

-          npx dpdm "./src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" --circular --warning=false --tree=false \                     
+          npx dpdm "./src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" --circular --warning=false --tree=false \
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 58-58: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e9cdaf and 1e796ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml

[error] 58-58: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (3)

67-72: Updated Checkout for Base Branch
The checkout step now correctly references the pull request’s base branch using ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }} with clean: false, ensuring that the proper branch is checked out. This meets the PR objective.


97-99: Variable Substitution in Comparison Step
The updated substitution of base_branch_count and calculation of diff in the comparison step look correct and better aligned with the base branch change objectives.


129-130: Descriptive PR Comment Message
The PR comment message now clearly states the dependency difference and references the base branch. This makes it easier for reviewers and contributors to understand the comparison context.

Comment on lines 84 to 86
npx dpdm "./src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" --circular --warning=false --tree=false \
| sed '1d; s/^[[:space:]]*[0-9]\{4\})[[:space:]]*/• /; /^[[:space:]]*$/d' \
| sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Fix Redirection Operator in Base Branch Dependency Count
There is an extra > in the redirection operator on line 86 (> > base_branch_circular_deps.txt), which will cause a syntax error during execution. Please remove the duplicate redirection symbol. Also, note there is trailing whitespace on line 84 per static analysis.

Diff suggestion:

-          | sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
+          | sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
npx dpdm "./src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" --circular --warning=false --tree=false \
| sed '1d; s/^[[:space:]]*[0-9]\{4\})[[:space:]]*/• /; /^[[:space:]]*$/d' \
| sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
npx dpdm "./src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" --circular --warning=false --tree=false \
| sed '1d; s/^[[:space:]]*[0-9]\{4\})[[:space:]]*/• /; /^[[:space:]]*$/d' \
| sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

84-86: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix Extra Redirection Operator and Trailing Whitespace in Base Branch Dependency Command

An extra redirection operator (> >) is detected on line 86, which will cause a syntax error. Also, trailing whitespace is present on line 84. Please remove the extra > and any undesired whitespace.

-          | sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
+          | sort | sed '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' > base_branch_circular_deps.txt
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

58-60: Remove Trailing Whitespace in PR Branch Dependency Command

There are trailing spaces at the end of the command on line 58 which could lead to formatting inconsistencies. Please remove any extra whitespace.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 58-58: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e796ac and 6ea6401.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml

[error] 58-58: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

110-111: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure Cross-Platform Compatibility for Inline Sed Editing

The commands using sed -i '' (BSD-style inline editing) on lines 110 and 111 may not work as expected on the Ubuntu runner (which uses GNU sed). Consider switching to GNU sed syntax, for example by using sed -i without the empty string.

-          sed -i '' '10,14d' pr_circular_deps.txt
+          sed -i '10,14d' pr_circular_deps.txt
-          sed -i '' '20,29d' base_branch_circular_deps.txt
+          sed -i '20,29d' base_branch_circular_deps.txt

@dvj1988 dvj1988 removed the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (2)

73-77: Review Commented-out Code

The commented-out dependency installation step (lines 73–77) could lead to future confusion if left in the file without context. Consider either removing it or adding a clarifying comment explaining its purpose.


103-103: Remove Trailing Whitespace

YAMLlint has flagged trailing whitespace on line 103. Removing the extra spaces will keep the file clean and adhere to style guidelines.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ea6401 and 4a6da6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (9)

43-47: Ensure Consistency for dpdm Global Install Step

The step installs the dpdm package globally using version 3.14. Please confirm that this is the intended version for your dependency graph analysis.


48-53: Review Dependencies Installation Step

The command to install dependencies with yarn install --immutable is straightforward and looks correct.


58-59: Verify dpdm Command Pipeline for PR Branch

The dpdm command piped through sed and sort properly formats the output into pr_circular_deps.txt. The regular expression and pipeline are a bit complex, so consider an inline comment or a note for future maintainers if any troubleshooting is required later.


66-72: Ensure Correct Base Branch Checkout

The checkout step now uses the pull request’s base branch via ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }} with clean: false. Please verify that retaining the working directory state (i.e. not cleaning) is intentional and does not cause unintended side effects in later steps.


78-90: Assess Base Branch Dependency Count Step

The base branch dependency count step clears the node_modules directory before executing dpdm, which helps ensure a clean analysis. Confirm that removing node_modules here will not affect any subsequent steps in the workflow.


91-97: Validation of Circular Dependency Comparison Logic

The arithmetic subtraction to compute the diff (diff="$((pr_count - base_branch_count))") appears correct. If there's any possibility that the base branch could have more circular dependencies than the PR branch, you might consider whether a negative diff should be explicitly handled.


104-108: Confirm Diff Save Functionality

Saving the unified diff using the diff -u command to diff_output.txt is clear and effective. This prepares the data for the subsequent logging step.


109-121: Log Diff Extraction is Clear

The block that logs dependency changes—by echoing removed dependencies (lines starting with a single hyphen) and added ones (lines starting with a single plus)—is well structured. Consider handling the case where no changes are detected to avoid empty logs.


130-130: Update PR Comment Message Template

The PR comment message template correctly uses template literals to reference the evaluated diff and the base branch name, ensuring that the information is dynamic and accurate.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (1)

43-47: Installation of Global Dependency (dpdm) Added
A new step to globally install [email protected] has been introduced. This appropriately ensures that the required version is available before later steps run.

Suggestion: Consider caching the npm modules if CI speed becomes a concern.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a6da6f and 10a833f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (8)

48-53: Installing Dependencies Step Added
The step to install dependencies using Yarn is clear and placed after installing dpdm. This ensures the workspace is correctly set up before running dependency analysis.


58-59: Formatting of dpdm Output for PR Branch Analysis
The dpdm command is piped through sed and sort to filter and format the circular dependencies list. Please verify that the regular expression fits all expected output cases from dpdm.

Suggestion: If the sed pattern needs future adjustments or becomes too hard to maintain, consider moving the formatting logic into a helper script.


66-72: Checkout Base Branch Step Updated
The checkout step now uses the pull request’s base branch (${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}) with clean: false, which aligns with the PR objectives. This change ensures subsequent dependency checks operate on the correct branch.


82-89: Counting Circular Dependencies on Base Branch
This step removes the node_modules directory and then processes the circular dependency check with dpdm on the base branch. The use of a similar sed/ sort pipeline maintains consistency with the PR branch check.

Note: Ensure that the removal of node_modules does not have unintended side effects on subsequent steps.


91-98: Comparing Circular Dependencies Between PR and Base Branch
The subtraction of base_branch_count from pr_count via arithmetic expansion is correct. This step now accurately computes the difference in circular dependencies.

Note: Double-check that both output variables are being set correctly by the previous steps.


104-107: Saving Diff Output of Circular Dependencies
A step has been added to save the unified diff between the base branch and PR circular dependencies. The use of || true prevents failures due to non-zero diff exit codes, which is appropriate here.


109-121: Logging the Diff of Circular Dependencies
The newly added logging step neatly separates “Dependencies removed” and “Dependencies added” using grep filters on the diff output. This will help in quickly identifying changes.

Suggestion: Consider handling the case when no diff exists, for better logging clarity.


129-129: Updated PR Comment Message Reflecting Base Branch Usage
The comment generated on the pull request now correctly references the base branch (${{github.event.pull_request.base.ref}}) instead of the outdated release branch. This improves clarity for contributors reviewing the cyclic dependency results.

if [ "$diff" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "has_more_cyclic_deps=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "diff=$diff" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Trailing Whitespace Detected
Static analysis flagged trailing spaces on line 103. Please remove the extra whitespace to comply with YAML formatting standards.

Diff suggestion:

-      
+      

(Ensure there are no spaces after the line break.)

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (3)

58-64: PR Branch Dependency Count Command
The command using npx dpdm piped into a series of sed and sort commands effectively processes the circular dependency output. Ensure that the sed expressions remain valid as the output format of dpdm might evolve. Also, consider incorporating error-checking for the dpdm command to handle any unforeseen failures.


73-77: Commented-out Dependency Installation Code
There is an entire section of commented-out code for reinstalling dependencies. Consider removing these comments if they are no longer necessary to keep the workflow file clean and maintainable.


103-103: Trailing Whitespace Detected
Static analysis flagged trailing whitespace on this line. Please remove any extra spaces to comply with YAML formatting guidelines and avoid linting errors.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10a833f and ebd2e77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml

[error] 103-103: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/ci-client-cyclic-deps-check.yml (8)

43-43: Global dpdm Installation Comment
The comment clearly states that the dpdm package is being installed globally (with a pinned version of 3.14). This is clear and useful for understanding the intent of the step.


48-48: Install Dependencies Step Annotation
The added comment in the "Install dependencies" step provides clarity on the purpose of the step. The use of yarn install --immutable appears consistent with dependency management best practices.


70-71: Checkout Base Branch Update
Updating the checkout step to use ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }} correctly switches the context from a static release branch to the dynamic base branch. The explicit setting of clean: false is noted—please verify that residual workspace changes do not affect subsequent steps.


82-89: Base Branch Dependency Count Command and Environment Reset
The base branch dependency check mirrors the PR branch step but begins with an explicit removal of the node_modules directory. This ensures a clean state, which is good for reproducibility. Double-check that removing node_modules does not interfere with other steps that may depend on installed packages later in the workflow.


95-97: Dependency Comparison Logic
The logic that calculates the difference between pr_count and base_branch_count correctly references the updated outputs. The subtraction and conditional check ensure that the workflow only flags an increase in cyclic dependencies. Verify that negative differences (if any) are intentionally ignored by the current if-condition.


104-108: Diff Saving Step
The step capturing the diff between the base branch and PR circular dependency files is well implemented by using a subshell with a fallback (|| true). This prevents the step from failing if the diff command returns a non-zero exit code due to no differences.


110-119: Log Diff in Circular Dependencies
The grep commands in this step extract the removed and added dependencies effectively from the diff output. The approach is clear and the logging is helpful for debugging dependency changes. Consider adding error handling if diff.txt turns out empty, although the current implementation with || true provides a safeguard.


128-128: PR Comment Message Update
The updated message now correctly references the base branch and provides a clear summary of the cyclic dependency changes along with a link to further documentation. This enhances transparency for reviewers and contributors.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔴🔴🔴 Cyclic Dependency Check:

This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 71, when compared with the release branch.

Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR.

You can view the dependency diff in the run log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants