Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipeline fix #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Pipeline fix #44

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

urumo
Copy link
Contributor

@urumo urumo commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced workflow responsiveness by broadening the monitored paths for changes in the src directory.
    • Introduced a new build step for contracts, improving the deployment process.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated workflow that was no longer needed.
  • Documentation

    • Updated workflow names for clarity in build and push processes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the removal of the .github/workflows/api.yml file, which defined a GitHub Actions workflow for API-related tasks. In contrast, the .github/workflows/production.yml file has been updated to broaden the paths monitored for changes, allowing more flexibility in triggering builds. Additionally, the production workflow has been enhanced with new steps for building and pushing Docker images for both the API and contracts, improving its responsiveness and functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/api.yml Removed the workflow named "Api" which included jobs for qa and build, triggered on specific events related to the master branch.
.github/workflows/production.yml Updated to monitor all changes in src/**/**, renamed the build step to "Build and push api", and added a new step for building and pushing contracts images.

Possibly related PRs

  • CI #22: The changes in .github/workflows/api.yml in this PR are directly related to the main PR as both involve modifications to the same workflow file, specifically regarding the triggers and job configurations for the GitHub Actions workflow.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits hop,
We’ve tidied our workflows, made some swaps!
The API's gone, but fear not, dear friend,
For production now builds with a broader blend.
Docker images dance, contracts in tow,
Hooray for the changes, let our pipelines flow! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@urumo urumo requested a review from 0xF6 November 15, 2024 00:15
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 629b059 and 2196b96.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/api.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/production.yml (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/api.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/production.yml

[error] 11-11: syntax error: expected , but found ''

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/production.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-46: Verify migration of all necessary steps from api.yml

Since api.yml was removed, please verify that all critical steps from that workflow have been properly migrated to this production workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try to find more information about the removed api.yml workflow.


Based on the git history, I can now provide a final response since I have found the removed api.yml workflow and can compare it with the current production.yml workflow.

Migration from api.yml to production.yml is complete and improved

The migration of api.yml to production.yml has been properly executed with the following key improvements:

  • Paths monitoring expanded from specific directories to all src/** changes
  • Registry credentials updated from staging (svck.dev) to production (ghcr.io)
  • Runner changed from ARM64 to ubuntu-latest for better compatibility
  • Added new build step for contracts image alongside the api image
  • Maintained all critical workflow components (checkout, QA, authentication, build & push)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the removed api.yml with current workflow
# to ensure no critical steps were missed

# Get the deleted api.yml content from git history
git log -p --all -S "name: API" -- .github/workflows/api.yml

# List all workflow files to ensure no other related workflows exist
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml" -exec echo "=== {}" \; -exec cat {} \;

Length of output: 2970


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old api.yml workflow
rg -l "api.yml" .

# Look for commits that modified or removed api.yml
git log --full-history --all -- "**/api.yml"

# Search for any docker-related changes in the git history that might have been in api.yml
git log -p --all -S "docker/build-push-action" -- .github/workflows/

Length of output: 19428

- 'src/Argon.Api/**'
- 'src/Argon.Contracts/**'
- 'src/ServiceDefaults/**'
- 'src/**/**
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix YAML syntax and optimize path pattern

The path pattern has two issues:

  1. Missing closing quote which causes YAML syntax error
  2. The double ** pattern is redundant

Apply this diff to fix the syntax and optimize the pattern:

-      - 'src/**/**
+      - 'src/**'

Also applies to: 11-11

Comment on lines +33 to +46
- name: Build and push api
uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Api/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.run_number }}
- name: Build and push contracts
uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Entry/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.run_number }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance Docker build configuration for better security and efficiency

Several improvements can be made to the Docker build steps:

  1. Update to latest docker/build-push-action
  2. Add SHA and latest tags
  3. Specify platform
  4. Enable build caching

Apply these changes to both build steps:

       - name: Build and push api
-        uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
         with:
           context: .
           file: ./src/Argon.Api/Dockerfile
           push: true
-          tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.run_number }}
+          tags: |
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.run_number }}
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.sha }}
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:latest
+          platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
+          cache-from: type=gha
+          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

       - name: Build and push contracts
-        uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
         with:
           context: .
           file: ./src/Argon.Entry/Dockerfile
           push: true
-          tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.run_number }}
+          tags: |
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.run_number }}
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.sha }}
+            ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:latest
+          platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
+          cache-from: type=gha
+          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Build and push api
uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Api/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.run_number }}
- name: Build and push contracts
uses: docker/build-push-action@v2
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Entry/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.run_number }}
- name: Build and push api
uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Api/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: |
ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.run_number }}
ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:${{ github.sha }}
ghcr.io/argon-chat/orleans:latest
platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
- name: Build and push contracts
uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
with:
context: .
file: ./src/Argon.Entry/Dockerfile
push: true
tags: |
ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.run_number }}
ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:${{ github.sha }}
ghcr.io/argon-chat/entry:latest
platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

@0xF6 0xF6 merged commit e331e5e into master Nov 15, 2024
2 checks passed
@0xF6 0xF6 deleted the feature/ci-pipeline-entry branch November 15, 2024 00:23
@argon-chat argon-chat locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants