Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/replace serialization #59

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

0xF6
Copy link
Member

@0xF6 0xF6 commented Nov 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new NATS streaming capabilities and improved asynchronous handling in the application.
    • Added support for serialization enhancements using MessagePack.
    • Integrated Entity Framework repositories for improved data management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated NATS client configuration to streamline service setup.
  • Documentation

    • Updated service configurations to reflect new dependencies and features.
  • Chores

    • Cleaned up unused mapping profiles and classes to simplify the codebase.

0xF6 added 3 commits November 23, 2024 20:49
- Added output path for compiler-generated files.
- Enabled emitting of compiler-generated files.
- Removed AutoMapper-related classes that were no longer needed.
- Updated serializer configuration to use MessagePack instead of MemoryPack.
- Added new serialization setup for MessagePack in the contracts.
- Introduced a new class for NATS streaming setup.
- Refactored the adapter factory to use async containers for stream and consumer.
- Updated the method to create adapters with asynchronous initialization.
- Cleaned up program configuration by removing old NATS connection code.
@0xF6 0xF6 requested a review from urumo November 23, 2024 18:26
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a9103d and 9b68375.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • src/Argon.Api/Argon.Api.csproj (2 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/FuckingAutoMapperIHateThisLibraryStupidIdiots.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/Mappers.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/OrleansExtension.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsAdapterFactory.cs (4 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsSvackaMamuWentToKino.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Program.cs (4 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Contracts/ReplaceSerializerFusion.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Entry/Program.cs (0 hunks)
 _______________________________________________
< Now streaming live: defusing your code bombs. >
 -----------------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       /   づ

Tip

You can customize the tone of the review comments and chat replies.

Set the tone_instructions setting in your project's settings in CodeRabbit to customize the tone of the review comments and chat replies. For example, you can set the tone to Act like a strict teacher, Act like a pirate and more.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@urumo urumo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

билд фейлится но и х с ним

@urumo urumo merged commit 4d90dba into master Nov 23, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@urumo urumo deleted the feature/replace-serialization branch November 23, 2024 18:28
@argon-chat argon-chat locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/OrleansExtension.cs (2)

19-19: Review MessagePack serialization configuration

The serializer is configured with default options which might not be optimal for your use case. Consider:

  1. Explicitly configuring MessagePack options for better control over serialization behavior
  2. Adding custom formatters if needed
  3. Evaluating performance impact of switching from MemoryPack to MessagePack

Example configuration to consider:

-builder.Services.AddSerializer(x => x.AddMessagePackSerializer(null, null, MessagePackByteSerializer.Default.Options));
+builder.Services.AddSerializer(x => x.AddMessagePackSerializer(null, null, options => {
+    options.CompressStrings = true;
+    options.OmitNull = true;
+    // Add custom formatters if needed
+    // options.Formatters.Add(new YourCustomFormatter());
+}));

Line range hint 1-45: Consider documenting serialization strategy changes

Given the significant changes in serialization approach:

  1. Document the rationale for switching from MemoryPack to MessagePack
  2. Create migration guide for existing data
  3. Add performance benchmarks comparing old vs new serialization
  4. Update deployment procedures if needed

This will help maintain the system's maintainability and assist future developers.

src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsSvackaMamuWentToKino.cs (2)

15-23: Consider restructuring service registration

The current implementation could benefit from a more structured approach:

  1. Group related services
  2. Add error handling for service creation
  3. Consider using configuration options pattern
+public record NatsOptions
+{
+    public string ConnectionString { get; init; } = null!;
+}

+builder.Services.Configure<NatsOptions>(options =>
+{
+    options.ConnectionString = natsConnectionString;
+});

+builder.Services.AddNatsServices(sp =>
+{
+    var options = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<NatsOptions>>();
+    var client = new NatsClient(options.Value.ConnectionString);
+    return client;
+});

1-44: Consider adding security and resilience measures

The current implementation could benefit from additional architectural considerations:

  1. Add security configuration for NATS connection
  2. Implement retry policies for connection failures
  3. Add health checks for NATS services
  4. Consider implementing circuit breaker pattern

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural improvements?

src/Argon.Api/Argon.Api.csproj (2)

10-11: LGTM! Good architectural shift to compile-time generation.

The addition of compiler generation settings aligns well with the move from runtime mapping (AutoMapper) to compile-time mapping (Mapperly). This should improve performance by moving work from runtime to compile-time.


Line range hint 1-85: Strong architectural improvements in serialization and mapping strategy.

The changes demonstrate a well-thought-out architectural evolution:

  1. Moving from runtime (AutoMapper) to compile-time (Mapperly) mapping will improve performance
  2. Standardizing on MessagePack serialization with Orleans should provide better efficiency
  3. The Orleans ecosystem integration looks comprehensive with broadcast channel support

Consider documenting these architectural decisions in a README or ADR (Architecture Decision Record) to help future maintainers understand the rationale.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a9103d and 9b68375.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • src/Argon.Api/Argon.Api.csproj (2 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/FuckingAutoMapperIHateThisLibraryStupidIdiots.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/Mappers.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/OrleansExtension.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsAdapterFactory.cs (4 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsSvackaMamuWentToKino.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Api/Program.cs (4 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Contracts/ReplaceSerializerFusion.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Argon.Entry/Program.cs (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/FuckingAutoMapperIHateThisLibraryStupidIdiots.cs
  • src/Argon.Api/Features/Mapper/Mappers.cs
  • src/Argon.Entry/Program.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Argon.Contracts/ReplaceSerializerFusion.cs
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/OrleansExtension.cs (2)

Line range hint 20-45: Storage serialization configuration is missing

The removal of the storage serializer without replacement in the ADO.NET grain storage configuration is concerning. This affects how grain state is serialized to/from PostgreSQL.

Please verify:

  1. If the default Orleans serializer is compatible with your storage requirements
  2. If any existing stored data needs migration
✅ Verification successful

Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:

Storage serialization removal is safe to proceed

The removed MemoryPackStorageSerializer was primarily focused on PubSub state serialization, using a combination of MemoryPack and JSON serialization. Orleans provides a default serializer that is compatible with ADO.NET storage, and the removal doesn't impact existing data as:

  • The custom serializer was mainly handling PubSubSubscriptionState
  • The implementation contained TODO comments and non-production-ready code
  • Orleans' built-in serialization is sufficient for the grain states in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for storage serializer usage in other parts of the codebase
rg -A 5 "AddAdoNetGrainStorage|IStorageSerializer" --type csharp

# Look for any migration scripts or related storage configuration
fd -e sql -e cs -H -I "migration|storage|serializ" 

Length of output: 1569


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of MemoryPackStorageSerializer to understand its implementation
cat src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/MemoryPackStorageSerializer.cs

# Check if there are any grain state classes that might be affected
rg -l "IGrainState|[Serializable]" --type csharp

# Look for any Orleans storage configuration in other parts
rg -A 3 "UseStorage|ConfigureStorage" --type csharp

Length of output: 6776


3-3: Verify usage of ActualLab.Serialization

The ActualLab.Serialization namespace is imported but doesn't appear to be used in the visible code.

✅ Verification successful

ActualLab.Serialization import is used and required

The import is actively used in the codebase:

  • In ReplaceSerializerFusion.cs for configuring MessagePack serialization defaults
  • Both files are part of the broader serialization strategy change, where ActualLab.Serialization provides core serialization types like MessagePackByteSerializer and ByteSerializer
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of ActualLab.Serialization in the codebase
rg -l "ActualLab\.Serialization" --type csharp

# Search for specific usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'using ActualLab.Serialization;'

Length of output: 366


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files to understand the usage
rg -A 10 "ActualLab\.Serialization" --type csharp

# Look for specific serializer types or methods from ActualLab
ast-grep --pattern 'new $_Serializer'

# Check if there are any configuration methods using ActualLab
ast-grep --pattern 'Configure$_($$$)'

Length of output: 2316

src/Argon.Api/Program.cs (5)

9-9: LGTM: New imports align with the architectural changes

The added imports for EF and Repositories namespaces properly support the transition to Entity Framework-based repositories.

Also applies to: 15-15


69-70: LGTM: Proper middleware ordering and environment-specific configuration

The authentication and authorization middleware are correctly ordered and appropriately configured for non-managed environments.


Line range hint 1-84: Verify complete removal of NATS dependencies

The AI summary indicates that NATS client configuration was removed. Let's verify that all related NATS dependencies and usages have been properly cleaned up to prevent orphaned code.


31-33: Verify the impact of null options in managed environment

Using null options with AddNpgsqlDbContext might skip important configurations that are present in the non-managed environment. Consider whether options like error logging should be consistent across environments.

✅ Verification successful

Using null options in managed environment is intentional and safe

The null options in the managed environment (Docker/Kubernetes) is an intentional design choice that doesn't skip any critical configurations:

  1. Both environments use the same connection string ("DefaultConnection") and the same TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor
  2. The additional options in non-managed environment (EnableDetailedErrors, EnableSensitiveDataLogging) are debug-focused features that should not be enabled in production/managed environments for security reasons
  3. The managed environment uses AddNpgsqlDbContext which is a specialized configuration method, while the non-managed environment uses the more verbose AddDbContext for development-time features
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of AddNpgsqlDbContext to understand the standard configuration
rg -A 5 "AddNpgsqlDbContext.*null" 

Length of output: 479


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the IsManaged extension method to understand the environment conditions
rg -A 5 "IsManaged"

# Search for other DbContext configurations in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'AddDbContext<$_>($_)'

# Look for any documentation about database configuration
fd README.md --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2511


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for AddNpgsqlDbContext implementation or extension method
rg -A 10 "AddNpgsqlDbContext"

# Look for any database configuration in appsettings files
fd appsettings.json --exec cat {}

# Search for TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor to understand its functionality
ast-grep --pattern 'class TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor'

Length of output: 16273


61-61: Verify the repository registration implementation

The addition of AddEfRepositories() aligns with the migration to EF-based repositories. Let's verify its implementation to ensure proper registration of all required repositories.

src/Argon.Api/Argon.Api.csproj (2)

42-42: Verify Orleans version consistency and package conflicts.

The new packages introduce MessagePack serialization and Mapperly for object mapping. A few points to verify:

  1. Ensure all Orleans packages use consistent versions
  2. Verify no conflicts with existing serialization packages

Also applies to: 47-47, 55-55


15-17: Verify the generated files path handling.

The setup correctly prevents double compilation while keeping generated files visible. However, let's verify that the path handling works correctly across different build environments.

✅ Verification successful

Path handling for generated files is correctly configured

The project setup is correct and follows best practices:

  • CompilerGeneratedFilesOutputPath is properly defined as "Generated" in the project file
  • EmitCompilerGeneratedFiles is enabled
  • The path variable usage in the ItemGroup is correct, using MSBuild syntax
  • The Generated directory not existing in the sandbox is expected as it's created during build time

The configuration will work correctly across different build environments as it:

  • Uses relative paths
  • Follows MSBuild conventions for path variables
  • Is properly scoped to the project directory
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the Generated directory exists and contains .cs files
# This helps verify if the source generators are working as expected

# Check if Generated directory exists
if [ -d "src/Argon.Api/Generated" ]; then
    echo "Generated directory exists"
    # List all .cs files in Generated directory
    find src/Argon.Api/Generated -name "*.cs" -type f
else
    echo "Warning: Generated directory not found"
fi

Length of output: 123


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the project file for the actual CompilerGeneratedFilesOutputPath value
cat src/Argon.Api/Argon.Api.csproj

# Also search for any other .csproj files that might define this path
fd -e csproj -x cat {}

# Check for any Directory.Build.props which might define this property
fd "Directory.Build.props" -x cat {}

Length of output: 15123

src/Argon.Api/Features/Orleanse/Streams/NatsAdapterFactory.cs (3)

4-4: Importing Argon.Features namespace

The addition of using Argon.Features; brings in necessary features and indicates integration with the Argon feature set.


127-128: Use of AsyncContainer for asynchronous resource management

Changing _stream and _consumer to AsyncContainer<INatsJSStream> and AsyncContainer<INatsJSConsumer> appropriately handles asynchronous initialization and access of these resources.


132-132: Constructor updated to accept AsyncContainer parameters

The constructor now accepts AsyncContainer<INatsJSStream> and AsyncContainer<INatsJSConsumer> parameters, aligning with the updated private fields and promoting consistency in asynchronous handling.

Comment on lines +8 to +9
public static class NatsSvackaMamuWentToKino
{
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Rename class to follow professional naming conventions

The current class name contains inappropriate language. Consider renaming it to something more professional like NatsStreamingExtensions or NatsConfiguration.

Comment on lines +27 to +28
public class NatsFuckingMomOfSvackFactory
{
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Rename class to follow professional naming conventions

The current class name contains inappropriate language. Consider renaming it to NatsStreamFactory or NatsStreamingFactory.

Comment on lines +13 to +14
// TODO: Yuuki said he knows a way to make this look elegant, until then, this is the best we have
var natsConnectionString = builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("nats") ?? throw new ArgumentNullException("Nats");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling for connection string retrieval

The current implementation could be more robust:

  1. The error message should be more descriptive
  2. Consider using GetRequiredConnectionString instead
-var natsConnectionString = builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("nats") ?? throw new ArgumentNullException("Nats");
+var natsConnectionString = builder.Configuration.GetRequiredConnectionString("nats");
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// TODO: Yuuki said he knows a way to make this look elegant, until then, this is the best we have
var natsConnectionString = builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("nats") ?? throw new ArgumentNullException("Nats");
// TODO: Yuuki said he knows a way to make this look elegant, until then, this is the best we have
var natsConnectionString = builder.Configuration.GetRequiredConnectionString("nats");

Comment on lines +40 to +44
private async Task<INatsJSStream> CreateStream()
=> await _ctx.CreateStreamAsync(new StreamConfig("ARGON_STREAM", ["argon.streams.*"]));
private async Task<INatsJSConsumer> CreateComsoomer()
=> await _ctx.CreateOrUpdateConsumerAsync("ARGON_STREAM", new ConsumerConfig("streamConsoomer"));
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve stream and consumer configuration

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. Hardcoded stream and consumer names
  2. Missing error handling
  3. No configuration options for stream/consumer settings

Consider this improved implementation:

+public record StreamSettings
+{
+    public string StreamName { get; init; } = "ARGON_STREAM";
+    public string[] Subjects { get; init; } = ["argon.streams.*"];
+    public string ConsumerName { get; init; } = "streamConsumer";
+}

-private async Task<INatsJSStream> CreateStream()
-    => await _ctx.CreateStreamAsync(new StreamConfig("ARGON_STREAM", ["argon.streams.*"]));
+private async Task<INatsJSStream> CreateStream()
+{
+    try
+    {
+        var settings = _settings.Value;
+        return await _ctx.CreateStreamAsync(new StreamConfig(
+            settings.StreamName,
+            settings.Subjects));
+    }
+    catch (NatsJSException ex)
+    {
+        _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to create NATS stream");
+        throw;
+    }
+}

-private async Task<INatsJSConsumer> CreateComsoomer() 
-    => await _ctx.CreateOrUpdateConsumerAsync("ARGON_STREAM", new ConsumerConfig("streamConsoomer"));
+private async Task<INatsJSConsumer> CreateConsumer()
+{
+    try
+    {
+        var settings = _settings.Value;
+        return await _ctx.CreateOrUpdateConsumerAsync(
+            settings.StreamName,
+            new ConsumerConfig(settings.ConsumerName));
+    }
+    catch (NatsJSException ex)
+    {
+        _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to create NATS consumer");
+        throw;
+    }
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +35 to +39
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(x => x
.EnableDetailedErrors()
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
.UseNpgsql(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"))
.AddInterceptors([new TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor()]));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Security: Review sensitive data logging in non-managed environment

The non-managed environment enables both detailed errors and sensitive data logging. While useful for development, ensure this configuration doesn't accidentally expose sensitive information in staging or testing environments.

Consider wrapping these in additional environment checks:

 builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(x => x
-    .EnableDetailedErrors()
-    .EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
+    .EnableDetailedErrors(builder.Environment.IsDevelopment())
+    .EnableSensitiveDataLogging(builder.Environment.IsDevelopment())
     .UseNpgsql(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"))
     .AddInterceptors([new TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor()]));
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(x => x
.EnableDetailedErrors()
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
.UseNpgsql(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"))
.AddInterceptors([new TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor()]));
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(x => x
.EnableDetailedErrors(builder.Environment.IsDevelopment())
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging(builder.Environment.IsDevelopment())
.UseNpgsql(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"))
.AddInterceptors([new TimeStampAndSoftDeleteInterceptor()]));

Comment on lines +151 to +156
public async Task<IQueueAdapter> CreateAdapter()
{
await this._stream.DoCreateAsync();
await this._consumer.DoCreateAsync();
return this;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add exception handling in CreateAdapter() method

The CreateAdapter() method awaits _stream.DoCreateAsync() and _consumer.DoCreateAsync(). If either of these tasks fails, it could throw an exception that propagates up the call stack. Consider implementing exception handling to manage potential failures during asynchronous initialization and to ensure the adapter remains in a consistent state.

Apply the following changes to handle exceptions:

 public async Task<IQueueAdapter> CreateAdapter()
 {
-    await this._stream.DoCreateAsync();
-    await this._consumer.DoCreateAsync();
+    try
+    {
+        await _stream.DoCreateAsync();
+        await _consumer.DoCreateAsync();
+    }
+    catch (Exception ex)
+    {
+        _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to create stream or consumer.");
+        throw; // Re-throw or handle accordingly
+    }
     return this;
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +198 to +199
new Receiver(Name, receiverMonitor, _serializationManager, _loggerFactory.CreateLogger<Receiver>(), queueId, _connection, _js, _stream.Value,
_consumer.Value));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Potential NullReferenceException when accessing _stream.Value and _consumer.Value

In the CreateReceiver() method, accessing _stream.Value and _consumer.Value may lead to a NullReferenceException if these values are not yet initialized. If CreateReceiver() can be called before CreateAdapter() completes, there is a risk that the Value properties are still null.

Consider ensuring that _stream.Value and _consumer.Value are initialized before they are used. You might:

  • Verify that CreateAdapter() has been successfully completed before calling CreateReceiver().
  • Add null checks before accessing _stream.Value and _consumer.Value.
  • Refactor the code so that CreateReceiver() awaits the initialization if necessary.

For example:

 public IQueueAdapterReceiver CreateReceiver(QueueId queueId)
 {
+    if (_stream.Value == null || _consumer.Value == null)
+    {
+        throw new InvalidOperationException("Stream and consumer must be initialized before creating a receiver.");
+    }
     if (_receivers.TryGetValue(queueId, out var receiver)) return receiver;
     var dimensions      = new ReceiverMonitorDimensions(queueId.ToString());
     var receiverMonitor = ReceiverMonitorFactory(dimensions);
     receiver = _receivers.GetOrAdd(queueId,
         new Receiver(
             Name,
             receiverMonitor,
             _serializationManager,
             _loggerFactory.CreateLogger<Receiver>(),
             queueId,
             _connection,
             _js,
             _stream.Value,
             _consumer.Value));
     return receiver;
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants