feat(anta): Added the test case to verify SNMP Logging Configuration

[vitthalmagadum]

Description

Verifies whether the SNMP logging is enabled and SNMP manager(host) details in a specified VRF.

Expected Results
----------------
* Success: The test will pass if the SNMP logging is enabled and manager(host) details is in the specified VRF.
* Failure: The test will fail if the SNMP logging is disabled or the SNMP manager details are not correct.

Fixes #821

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have run pre-commit for code linting and typing (pre-commit run)
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes (tox -e testenv)

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #849 will not alter performance

_{Comparing vitthalmagadum:issue_821 (6449e97) with main (92cbcd3)}

Summary

✅ 8 untouched benchmarks

[MaheshGSLAB]

We should give the failure message like For SNMP host '{hostname }' expected vrf is blah but found blah11 instead.

[MaheshGSLAB]

if there is only option of ipv4 address then better to use host instead of hostname. If we can use and name then update input restriction

[MaheshGSLAB]

can you share the json output from device for hostname

[vitthalmagadum]

leaf1-dc1#show snmp | json
{
    "chassis": {
        "chassisId": "C2BB56D511CAB40E40B2DCD1E9D3A9C9"
    },
    "contact": {
        "contact": "\"Network Admin\""
    },
    "location": {
        "location": "\"Data Center A\""
    },
    "counters": {
        "serviceEnabled": true,
        "inPkts": 0,
        "inVersionErrs": 0,
        "inBadCommunityNames": 0,
        "inBadCommunityUses": 0,
        "inParseErrs": 0,
        "inRequestVars": 0,
        "inSetVars": 0,
        "inGetPdus": 0,
        "inGetNextPdus": 0,
        "inSetPdus": 0,
        "outPkts": 5,
        "outTooBigErrs": 0,
        "outNoSuchNameErrs": 0,
        "outBadValueErrs": 0,
        "outGeneralErrs": 0,
        "outGetResponsePdus": 0,
        "outTrapPdus": 5,
        "outTrapDrops": 0,
        "groupLength": 3,
        "numberOfGroups": 9,
        "numberOfViews": 0
    },
    "logging": {
        "loggingEnabled": true,
        "hosts": {
            "192.168.1.100": {
                "port": 162,
                "vrf": ""
            },
            "leaf1-dc1": {
                "port": 162,
                "vrf": ""
            },
            "spine": {
                "port": 162,
                "vrf": ""
            },
            "spine1-dc1.fun.aristanetworks.com": {
                "port": 162,
                "vrf": ""
            }
        }
    },
    "vrfs": {
        "snmpVrfs": [
            "default"
        ]
    },
    "srcIntf": {
        "sourceInterfaces": {
            "default": "Management0",
            "MGMT": "Ethernet1"
        }
    },
    "misc": {
        "transmitMsgMaxSize": 65536
    },
    "enabled": true,
}

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud