Validate and document schemas

[sajith]

Fixes #105. Changes:

• Adds some tests to validate component descriptions (topology, node, port,..) against their corresponding schemas.
• Updates the schemas so that $ref values refer to the correct external files, and other things that surfaced when testing.
• Formats the schemas using python3 -m json.tool <infile> <outfile. I just like mechanically formatted files. ;-)

[sajith]

This appears to be the way to validate a given JSON blob against a schema with Python:

import json
import pathlib

import jsonschema
import jsonref    # to expand `$ref`

blob = json.loads(pathlib.Path("port-data.json").read_text())
schema_file = pathlib.Path("port-schema.json")
schema = jsonref.loads(schema_file.read_text(), base_uri = schema_file.absolute().as_uri())

jsonschema.validate(blob, schema)

With some changes (correct $ref etc), most of the test data files validate against the schemas we have, except for this little annoying vendor thing:

datamodel/schemas/Service.json

Lines 15 to 24 in 2548a8e

	"vendor": {
	"not": [
	{
	"type": "array",
	"items": {
	"type": "string"
	}
	}
	]
	},

Perhaps that could be removed? The draft Data Model 2.0.0 spec has no mention of a vendor field.

[YufengXin]

Tthis can be commented out for now. Noticing the 'not' key, it was asked by FIU to be able to exclude certain vendor's equipments for security reasons.

[sajith]

Sadly JSON do not have "real" comment syntax. And it is the not that makes validator unhappy:

jsonschema.exceptions.SchemaError: [{'type': 'array', 'items': [{'type': 'string'}]}] is not of type 'object', 'boolean'

I'm guessing it should be "not": { "anyOf" : [...] }" -- that anyOf should give not the boolean it needs.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5903673856

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 74.635%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 5882765968:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	1029
Relevant Lines:	1247

---

💛 - Coveralls

[YufengXin]

Yes, this should work: "not": { "anyOf" : [...] }"

[YufengXin]

This tool is cool. I guess it's relatively new. I googled around and didn't find such a tool two years ago!