ci: Use sbomify to generate SBOMs #2151
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm working with sbomify to resolve why the step is failing |
|
@gkc I saw you merged trunk onto this last week, but no review 😭 |
gkc
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Progresses https://github.com/atsign-foundation/operations/issues/139
- What I did
Replaced Syft with sbomify
- How I did it
Repeated pattern from atsign-foundation/at_python#294
- How to verify it
Inspect workflow logs after next run of at_server
Full verification will require a prod promotion
- Description for the changelog
ci: Use sbomify to generate SBOMs