Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for lockstorm benchmark to dump data in special file. #2900

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

SamirMulani
Copy link
Contributor

Added support for lockstorm benchmark to dump data under "lockstorm_benc" dir under current job directory.

Added support for lockstorm benchmark to dump data under "lockstorm_benc"
dir under job directory.

Signed-off-by: Samir Mulani <[email protected]>

Addressed travis check error for lockstorm benchmark.

Addressed python style issue.

Signed-off-by: Samir Mulani <[email protected]>
@Naresh-ibm
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamirMulani please add the run logs for reference.

@SamirMulani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Run logs,
avocado run lockstorm_benchmark.py -m lockstorm_benchmark.py.data/lockstorm.yaml JOB ID : 8093eea24877cf627dd15d0101045a89db514f38 JOB LOG : /root/avocado-fvt-wrapper/results/job-2024-09-23T12.05-8093eea/job.log (1/1) lockstorm_benchmark.py:lockstorm_benchmark.test;run-cpu_list-test_iter-a6ef: STARTED (1/1) lockstorm_benchmark.py:lockstorm_benchmark.test;run-cpu_list-test_iter-a6ef: PASS (500.94 s) RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0 JOB HTML : /root/avocado-fvt-wrapper/results/job-2024-09-23T12.05-8093eea/results.html JOB TIME : 547.60 s

Copy link
Collaborator

@Naresh-ibm Naresh-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Naresh-ibm Naresh-ibm merged commit ef7e5c3 into avocado-framework-tests:master Sep 23, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants