Add Opik

[anmorgan24]

Thanks for taking the time to suggest an addition to awesome-selfhosted!

To ensure your Pull Request is dealt with swiftly, please check the following (check the boxes [x]):

• Submit one item per pull request. This eases reviewing and speeds up inclusion.
• You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
• Any software you are adding is not already listed at any of awesome-sysadmin, staticgen.com, staticsitegenerators.net, dbdb.io.
• The file you are adding is formatted as described in addition.md.
• Demo links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations.
• Comments and unused optional fields have been removed.
• The file you are adding uses kebab-case file naming, for example my-awesome-software.yml.
• Values for platform are the main server-side requirements for the software. Don't include frameworks or specific dialects.
• Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
• Any software project you are adding was first released more than 4 months ago.
• Any software project you are adding has working installation instructions.
• You understand that your Pull Request will be merged ~1 week after approval, to allow for further comments if needed.

[TheGiraffe3]

It looks like you included the whole issue body, not just the text required. Could you remove everything outside of the ```yaml tag?

[Ki-er]

As stated above

[anmorgan24]

Thank you so much for the super fast review and for suggesting the changes for me! I just accepted them all. Hopefully the PR should be all set now, but if you need me to update anything else, just let me know!

[Ki-er]

Hi, thanks for your contribution.

This project has not had a release within 12 months which is required for all projects to be added to awesome-selfhosted. Due to this, I think that we should wait 4 months, similiar to new projects due to the lack of releases.

We also recommend maintaining a simple changelog that will help users in tracking software changes, particularly those that are breaking changes or require configuration modifications.

Other reviewers can weigh in.

[jverre]

Hi @nodiscc @Ki-er
Following up on this for @anmorgan24

We have a bit of a mess on the Github repo that means that the timestamp for the releases are not actually the timestamps of the release but rather the creation time of another un-related release that was subsequently deleted.

We did actually do a release earlier this morning that has the correct timestamp in the Github release page, version 1.3.3 as can be seen here: https://github.com/comet-ml/opik/releases.

Here are also a few more places that showcase the fact that we try to do at least 1 release a week:

• Release history for the Python package that aligns with Github releases
• Project packages on Github docker image repository

Hopefully this clarifies a few things, sorry for the Github releases mess 😅