Skip to content

Add texlive packages to support exporting notebooks as PDFs #662

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

andychoquette
Copy link
Contributor

Description

PDF export of Jupyter notebooks currently throws an error due to missing package dependencies. This PR adds those missing dependencies.

Testing Done

Install listed packages in space and confirm error no longer appears.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

**Description**

PDF export of Jupyter notebooks currently throws an error due to missing package dependencies. This PR adds those missing dependencies.

**Testing Done**

Install listed packages in space and confirm error no longer appears.
@andychoquette andychoquette requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2025 15:19
@claytonparnell
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Andy for the PR! Main concern here would be disk size; installing these packages on top of SMD shows

Need to get 284 MB of archives.
After this operation, 1005 MB of additional disk space will be used.

Since image size is a concern for us in the Studio context, we need to see what the overall size change is in an image built with this and weigh pros/cons of exporting PDF vs increased latency for non-Fast Launch image version/instance types.

@andychoquette
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Clayton - A few qs:

  1. When can we build the image to confirm the total increase in image size / effects on latency?
  2. Who makes the decision if increased latency is acceptable for adding the capability?

I'll investigate how to fully disable this functionality in the meantime in case the effects of adding these packages are not acceptable.

@andychoquette
Copy link
Contributor Author

canceling in favor of #691

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants