Limit rule perfectionist/sort-modules to functions and classes

[mangs]

Pull Request Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• Readme and changelog updates were made reflecting this PR's changes
• Increase the project version number in package.json following Semantic Versioning

Changes Included

• Version bump to 2.4.0
• Disable rule perfectionist/sort-modules because it was added in Perfectionist version 4's recommended rules; linting friction should be reduced as a result.
• Upgrade dependencies to latest versions

[jduthon]

Rethinking this, I have a doubt 😅

Reading the PR description, it sounds like we were already using perfectionist/sort-modules, but I think that's not the case, right?

Thinking about how I would generally go about structuring a file in terms of functions, I'd rarely want to go alphabetical but instead either:

1. Group things that work together in blocks that work together (e.g. in a utils file)
2. Order from lowest level to highest level, slowly building the picture of what a specific function broken down to smaller units does

I'd find both of those superior to strict alphabetical ordering (despite they are hard to keep consistent).

Maybe we can run this by the team to gauge everyone's feelings on the topic, I might be in the minority.

[mangs]

Reading the PR description, it sounds like we were already using perfectionist/sort-modules, but I think that's not the case, right?

Good question. It comes as a default part of the /recommended rules as of Perfectionist version 4. So just further tweaking it here.

Maybe we can run this by the team to gauge everyone's feelings on the topic, I might be in the minority.

Good idea. I'll bring it up at standup. Thanks for taking a look.

[jduthon]

Looks great 🚀