Skip to content

Conversation

anson-ho-cb
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #106 (comment)

TODO:

  • Test benchmark again
  • Check if more places with similar issues

@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

let first_non_delete_idx = match first_non_delete_idx {
None => return Ok(PointerChange::None),
Some(idx) => idx,
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this not being caught by the current code? Is it stack overflow?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we don't have unit tests or benchmarks which requires deleting many non-existing values in a single transaction until #106 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants