Skip to content

docs: update Neovim intruction #1276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

docs: update Neovim intruction #1276

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

brianhuster
Copy link
Contributor

The configuration snippet for Neovim seems a bit outdated (it works, but I think we should recommend users the easy way)

The configuration snippet for Neovim seems a bit outdated (it works, but I think we should recommend users the easy way)
@skovhus skovhus enabled auto-merge April 22, 2025 07:37
@skovhus skovhus merged commit 0fa44e4 into bash-lsp:main Apr 22, 2025
4 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.63%. Comparing base (7419b20) to head (c12369d).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1276   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.63%   80.63%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1503     1503           
  Branches      371      371           
=======================================
  Hits         1212     1212           
  Misses        233      233           
  Partials       58       58           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants