Fix a bug if using priors #102
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, this should fix a bug when using priors - if I read the code for parsing configuration files correctly I am supposed to use a gaussian prior like this:
data.parameters['someparameter'] = [ 60, None, None, 5, 1, 'cosmo', 'gaussian', 60, 5]However this fails as the parameter type currently is read from the last entry of the above array. The following works but seems overly verbose:
data.parameters['someparameter'] = [ 60, None, None, 5, 1, 'cosmo', 'gaussian', 60, 5, 'cosmo'].Please let me know in case this is intended behavior for some reason.