Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming consistency and mistyped sign - Maxwell dielectric Notebook #204

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

deweatherman
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

In first markdown cell, where the theory behind the example is given, there were a couple of inconsistencies:

  • Naming for the total exterior fields (+)
  • Sign relating incident, scattered and total fields

Other changes appearing when comparing the versions are irrelevant (I re-ran the notebook locally, thus a bunch of irrelevant info is there).

…ple; in particular the external fields were not referered with the plus sign everywhere, and also there was a mistyped sign relating incident, scattered and total fields.
@deweatherman
Copy link
Contributor Author

And actually, I used "tangential" when I should have used "rotated tangential" for the trace (following Hiptmair's naming convention), sorry for that!

@deweatherman deweatherman changed the title Naming consistency and mistyped sign Naming consistency and mistyped sign - Maxwell dielectric Notebook Feb 27, 2024
Exn defines a rotated version of the actual tangential component of E (given by nx(Exn)
@deweatherman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will try a new pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant