Merge pull request #2059 from betterscientificsoftware/curfman-patch-1

Update WhatScienceSaysIsTheBestFont.md

CuratedContent/Jupyter4Science.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Jupyter4Science: Better Practices for using Jupyter Notebooks for Science
+# Jupyter4Science: Better Practices for Using Jupyter Notebooks for Science
 
 <!--deck text start-->
 [Jupyter4Science](https://jupyter4.science) is a **knowledge base** of original content and curated resources about developing and sharing Jupyter notebooks as they are used in the context of scientific applications.
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ The knowledge base contains original content including tutorials, templates, blo
 
 Topics include:
 
-- Development Environments for Jupyter Notebooks
-- Reproducible Environments
-- Sharing Notebooks
-- Creating Publications with Quarto
-- Templates and Best Practices
-- Jupyter Notebooks as Peer-Reviewed Publications
-- Building Data Dashboards and Web Applications with Jupyter Notebooks 
+- Development environments for Jupyter notebooks
+- Reproducible environments
+- Sharing notebooks
+- Creating publications with Quarto
+- Templates and best practices
+- Jupyter notebooks as peer-reviewed publications
+- Building data dashboards and web applications with Jupyter notebooks 
 
 <img src='../images/jupyter4science-2.png' class='logo' />
 

CuratedContent/WhatScienceSaysIsTheBestFont.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# What Science Says is the Best Font
+# What Science Says Is the Best Font
 <!--deck text start-->
 Sorry Times New Roman fans, Sans Serif wins the font wars.
 <!--deck text end-->
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ Presenter | [SciShow YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/@SciShow)
 Web links | [Video](https://youtu.be/7g_7Cr1vEnM?si=aZ8UpyNdglD3e6S2) (~20 mins)
 
 This SciShow channel video delves into several research studies on the "best" fonts for various situations.
-While the video **does not** address the specific topic of fonts used for software development tasks (though there is [another article](https://realpython.com/coding-font/) that does), it does discuss fonts for people with various vision impairments.
+While the video **does not** address the specific topic of fonts used for software development tasks (though [another article](https://realpython.com/coding-font/) does), it does discuss fonts for people with various vision impairments.
 
 
 When it comes to fonts, serif typefaces are distinguished by the tiny lines or “feet” that extend off the letters, while fonts without these "feet" are categorized as sans serif.
 In general, results from the cited studies indicate that sans serif fonts, such as [Arial](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arial), perform better, although in some situations, the measured differences are marginal. 
-From an inclusivity perspective, two key takeaways are that italics are particularly challenging for readers with dyslexia and that greater spacing between letters in a font may be the biggest factor in improving readability for all readers.
+From an inclusivity perspective, two key takeaways are that italics are particularly challenging for readers with dyslexia, and that greater spacing between letters in a font may be the biggest factor in improving readability for all readers.
 
 Therefore, for written material in science, whether it be digital or print, attention to font type is paramount to ensuring maximum accessibility and readability for all readers.