Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add CI/CD stratedy
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
bigbag committed Dec 26, 2024
1 parent 5738e39 commit 55c6b49
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 296 additions and 10 deletions.
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ An intelligent system for matching job descriptions with candidate CVs/resumes u
- Python 3.12+
- Docker (optional)

## Documentation

- [Project Plan](docs/plan.md) - Development roadmap and milestones
- [CI/CD Strategy](docs/cd_strategy.md) - Continuous Deployment strategy
- [CI/CD](docs/cicd.md) - Continuous Integration and Deployment setup
- [Tests Description](docs/tests_description.md) - Overview of the testing methodology and framework
- [Test Cases](docs/test_cases.md) - Detailed test cases and scenarios


## Quick Start

1. Clone the repository:
Expand Down
287 changes: 287 additions & 0 deletions docs/cicd_strategy.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
# Deployment Strategy Documentation

## Table of Contents
- [Overview](#overview)
- [AWS Deployment Strategy](#aws-deployment-strategy)
- [Self-Hosted Deployment Strategy](#self-hosted-deployment-strategy)
- [Recommended Approaches](#recommended-approaches)

## Overview

This document outlines our deployment strategies for both AWS and self-hosted environments. Each approach is designed to maximize reliability, minimize downtime, and ensure consistent deployments across environments.

## AWS Deployment Strategy

### 1. Infrastructure as Code (IaC)
- Use AWS CloudFormation or Terraform to manage infrastructure
- Version control all infrastructure definitions
- Maintain separate configurations for staging and production

### 2. Containerization
- Docker containers for application packaging
- Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) for container storage
- Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) or Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) for orchestration

### 3. CI/CD Pipeline with GitHub Actions
```mermaid
graph LR
A[Code Push] --> B[GitHub Actions]
B --> C[Build & Test]
C --> D[Create & Push Container]
D --> E[Deploy]
```

#### Pipeline Configuration
```yaml
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
name: Deploy
on:
push:
branches: [main]
pull_request:
branches: [main]

jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Configure AWS credentials
uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v1
- name: Build and test
run: |
make test
make build
- name: Push to ECR
run: |
aws ecr get-login-password --region ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin ${{ secrets.ECR_REGISTRY }}
docker push ${{ secrets.ECR_REGISTRY }}/app:${{ github.sha }}
- name: Deploy to ECS
run: |
aws ecs update-service --cluster production --service app --force-new-deployment
```
#### Pipeline Steps:
1. Code push triggers GitHub Actions workflow
2. Run tests and security scans in GitHub-hosted runner
3. Build Docker image
4. Push to ECR using AWS credentials
5. Update ECS task definition/K8s deployment
6. Monitor deployment status
### 4. Blue-Green Deployment
- Maintain two identical production environments
- Route traffic using Route 53 or Application Load Balancer
- Zero-downtime deployments
- Easy rollback capability
## Self-Hosted Deployment Strategy
### 1. Infrastructure Setup
- Nginx as reverse proxy
- Docker and Docker Compose for containerization
- GitLab Runner or Jenkins for CI/CD
### 2. Deployment Process with GitHub Actions
```mermaid
graph LR
A[Git Push] --> B[GitHub Actions]
B --> C[Build & Test]
C --> D[Docker Build]
D --> E[Deploy via SSH]
```

#### GitHub Actions Configuration
```yaml
# .github/workflows/self-hosted.yml
name: Deploy to Self-Hosted
on:
push:
branches: [main]

jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Build and test
run: |
make test
make build
- name: Deploy to server
uses: appleboy/ssh-action@master
with:
host: ${{ secrets.SERVER_HOST }}
username: ${{ secrets.SERVER_USER }}
key: ${{ secrets.SSH_PRIVATE_KEY }}
script: |
cd /app
docker-compose pull
docker-compose up -d
```
#### Steps:
1. Automated deployment via GitHub Actions
2. SSH-based deployment using secure keys
3. Docker Compose for service orchestration
4. Health checks before switching traffic
5. Automated backup before deployment
### 3. Rolling Updates
- Update services one at a time
- Health check verification
- Automatic rollback on failure
## Recommended Approaches
### For AWS (Recommended)
We recommend the following strategy for AWS deployments:
1. **ECS with Fargate**
- Serverless container management
- Automatic scaling
- Cost-effective for variable loads
- Simplified infrastructure management
2. **Blue-Green Deployment**
- Zero downtime deployments
- Simple rollback process
- Production-grade reliability
### For Self-Hosted (Recommended)
For self-hosted environments, we recommend:
1. **Docker Compose with Traefik**
- Easy service orchestration
- Automatic SSL management
- Simple reverse proxy configuration
- Built-in load balancing
2. **Rolling Updates with Health Checks**
- Minimal downtime
- Controlled deployment process
- Automatic failure detection
## Security Considerations
### AWS
- Use AWS Secrets Manager for sensitive data
- Implement IAM roles with least privilege
- Enable AWS GuardDuty for threat detection
- Regular security audits
### Self-Hosted
- Use Vault for secrets management
- Implement fail2ban for intrusion prevention
- Regular security updates
- Automated backup system
## Monitoring and Logging
### AWS
- CloudWatch for logs and metrics
- X-Ray for distributed tracing
- SNS for alerts and notifications
### Self-Hosted
- Prometheus for metrics
- Grafana for visualization
- ELK Stack for log management
## Disaster Recovery
### AWS
- Multi-region backup strategy
- Automated snapshots
- Documented recovery procedures
### Self-Hosted
- Regular backups to off-site storage
- Documented recovery procedures
- Regular recovery testing
## Deployment Solutions Comparison
### AWS Deployment
#### Pros
- **Scalability**: Automatic scaling capabilities with ECS/EKS
- **Reliability**: Built-in high availability across availability zones
- **Managed Services**: Less operational overhead with managed services
- **Global Reach**: Easy deployment across multiple regions
- **Security**: Built-in security features and compliance certifications
- **Integration**: Seamless integration with other AWS services
- **Monitoring**: Comprehensive monitoring with CloudWatch
- **Backup**: Automated backup and disaster recovery options
#### Cons
- **Cost**: Can be expensive for high-traffic applications
- **Vendor Lock-in**: Dependency on AWS ecosystem
- **Complexity**: Learning curve for AWS services
- **Cost Prediction**: Difficult to predict exact costs
- **Data Transfer**: Expensive egress costs between regions
- **Configuration**: Complex configuration for some services
### Self-Hosted Deployment
#### Pros
- **Cost Control**: Predictable and potentially lower costs
- **Full Control**: Complete control over infrastructure
- **Data Privacy**: Direct control over data location and handling
- **Customization**: Flexibility to customize every aspect
- **No Vendor Lock-in**: Freedom to change providers
- **Performance**: Ability to optimize for specific use cases
- **Simple Architecture**: Often simpler to understand and debug
#### Cons
- **Maintenance**: Higher operational overhead
- **Scaling**: Manual scaling requires more effort
- **Reliability**: Need to implement HA solutions manually
- **Security**: Responsibility for all security aspects
- **Updates**: Manual system updates and patches
- **Monitoring**: Need to set up monitoring infrastructure
- **Expertise**: Requires more in-house expertise
### Decision Matrix
| Factor | AWS | Self-Hosted |
|-----------------|-------------------------|------------------------|
| Initial Cost | Low | Medium to High |
| Running Cost | High for scale | Predictable |
| Scalability | Excellent | Manual |
| Maintenance | Low | High |
| Control | Limited | Full |
| Security | Built-in | Manual Setup |
| Time to Deploy | Fast | Medium |
| Customization | Limited | Unlimited |
| Reliability | Very High | Depends on Setup |
### When to Choose AWS
- Startups needing quick deployment
- Projects requiring rapid scaling
- Applications with variable load
- Teams with limited DevOps resources
- Compliance-heavy applications
- Global application deployment
### When to Choose Self-Hosted
- Cost-sensitive long-term projects
- Applications with stable, predictable load
- Projects requiring full infrastructure control
- Data privacy-critical applications
- Teams with strong DevOps expertise
- Applications with specific hardware requirements
## Conclusion
For most projects, we strongly recommend the AWS deployment strategy using ECS/Fargate with blue-green deployment. This approach provides:
- Minimal operational overhead
- Excellent scalability
- Built-in high availability
- Comprehensive monitoring
- Simplified disaster recovery
However, for projects with specific requirements or budget constraints, our self-hosted strategy using Docker Compose and Traefik provides a robust and cost-effective alternative.
Remember to regularly review and update these deployment strategies as new tools and best practices emerge.
10 changes: 0 additions & 10 deletions docs/index.md

This file was deleted.

0 comments on commit 55c6b49

Please sign in to comment.