Corrected syntax error in CustomTextFieldStyles.css #489
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to the CSS for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Note: No sequence diagram is generated for this change as it is a minimal CSS syntax correction without significant functional modifications. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
There was a typo in CustomTextFieldStyles.css. @erenfn please check if its working correctly. |
|
Sure! I will check |
|
When I run 'npm run lint', it throws tons of formatting issues and inconsistencies might be the cause of different outputs.
|
|
That can be done, but these look like just removing blank spaces and switching ' with ". There can be another cause |
|
Majority of them are like related to blank space and replacing " with ' but there are other issues too!
I will fix these manually |
|
Okay then, sure. |
|
Also, would you like me to install Husky in our project? This will ensure the code gets automatically formatted every time someone commits or pushes changes. I can create a separate issue for that. |
|
Yeah sure, that would be great |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
Line range hint
101-101: Mom's spaghetti alert! 🍝 We've got an unused prop here!The
resetStateprop is defined in PropTypes but isn't used anywhere in the component. Either:
- Remove the unused PropType, or
- Implement the reset functionality
If you're planning to implement the reset functionality, here's a suggested implementation:
const RichTextEditor = ({ sx = {}, previewComponent, header, setHeader, setContent, content, + resetState, }) => {
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
Line range hint
47-51: Let's clean up this spaghetti code! 🍝The condition in useEffect could be simplified. Consider extracting the empty content check into a utility function for better readability.
+ const isEmptyContent = (content) => content === "<p></p>"; useEffect(() => { - if (editor?.isEmpty && content !== "<p></p>") { + if (editor?.isEmpty && !isEmptyContent(content)) { editor.commands.setContent(content); } }, [content]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
86-86: Yo dawg, we need to verify this absolute positioning!The switch from top to bottom positioning might cause layout issues if the parent container's height varies. Consider using a more flexible positioning approach.
Run this script to check for potential container height variations:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, I checked those layout vibes and they're straight fire! 🔥
That bottom: "35px" positioning is actually clean because the editor content (ProseMirror) rocks a fixed 7.5rem height with auto scrolling. No layout spaghetti here, fam!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for parent container height definitions rg -g '*.{css,scss,jsx,js}' 'editor-container' -A 5Length of output: 1100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EditorContent and related styles echo "=== Checking EditorContent styles ===" rg -g '*.{css,scss}' 'EditorContent|\.ProseMirror' -A 5 echo -e "\n=== Checking media queries affecting editor ===" rg -g '*.{css,scss}' '@media.*editor' -B 1 -A 5 echo -e "\n=== Checking parent component dimensions ===" ast-grep --pattern 'style={$_: {height: $_}}'Length of output: 1578
|
For now, I have only fixed the buttons. Attempting a linting fix would have affected 200+ files and might delayed the release. I will create a separate issue to address that.
|
MandeepPaul
deleted the
486-vite-and-vite-preview-produces-different-outputs
branch
Describe your changes
Corrected syntax error in CustomTextFieldStyles.css to ensure consistency between build and dev environments
Issue number
#486
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review: