Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Candidate fix #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Candidate fix #98

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

tjcw
Copy link
Contributor

@tjcw tjcw commented Oct 22, 2024

See issue #97 . Workaround for Windows compiler bug.

code without "if constexpr"
@pdimov pdimov merged commit 9b8d36e into boostorg:develop Oct 22, 2024
80 checks passed
@pdimov
Copy link
Member

pdimov commented Oct 22, 2024

Interestingly, the code was originally of this form, and was changed to iterate from 1 in this commit

6fdfb5b

to avoid a GCC 10 warning.

However, today's CI says that there's nothing wrong with GCC 10 anymore, and I see in the issue that you've tested with GCC 10 as well without problems.

I'll also change the second occurrence of the same loop to match.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants