You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As the NavState is just a 9D manifold, it doesn't inherit the LieGroup's convenient methods like Between. In working only with Navstate (mainly around imuFactor2) having a between for NavState would be cool for loop closures.
Motivation
Actually introducing a BetweenFactor<NavState> raise an error as traits<NaveState> has no Between method.
Pitch
Adding the method in traits<NavState> so that BetweenFactor<NavState> or if using expression between(NavStat_(key1), NavStat_(key2)) could be used in the graph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Interestingly, there are a few papers that define a Lie group "SE+(2)", which is just NavState plus a group operation I think. We could look into upgrading NavState and connecting to those papers...
Feature
As the NavState is just a 9D manifold, it doesn't inherit the LieGroup's convenient methods like Between. In working only with Navstate (mainly around imuFactor2) having a between for NavState would be cool for loop closures.
Motivation
Actually introducing a BetweenFactor<NavState> raise an error as traits<NaveState> has no Between method.
Pitch
Adding the method in traits<NavState> so that BetweenFactor<NavState> or if using expression between(NavStat_(key1), NavStat_(key2)) could be used in the graph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: