Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ELBO value is really low, is it ok? #187

Open
jessicaliu70 opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

ELBO value is really low, is it ok? #187

jessicaliu70 opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jessicaliu70
Copy link

jessicaliu70 commented Mar 23, 2023

1

cellranger:
newplot

here is the log file:
cellbender:remove-background: CellRanger v3 format
cellbender:remove-background: Trimming dataset for inference.
cellbender:remove-background: Including 32084 genes that have nonzero counts.
cellbender:remove-background: Prior on counts in empty droplets is 5
cellbender:remove-background: Prior on counts for cells is 2414
cellbender:remove-background: Excluding barcodes with counts below 5
cellbender:remove-background: Using 16137 probable cell barcodes, plus an additional 26137 barcodes, and 41803 empty droplets.
cellbender:remove-background: Largest surely-empty droplet has 106 UMI counts.
cellbender:remove-background: Running inference...

@sjfleming
Copy link
Member

Hi @jessicaliu70 , to me, it looks like this run failed to identify the empty droplet plateau correctly. I am saying that based on seeing that the log says "Prior on counts in empty droplets is 5". I would expect to see a value just over 100, based in the UMI curve you show there.

I might suggest trying

cellbender remove-background --cuda \
    --input your_input_file.h5 \
    --output your_output_file.h5 \
    --expected-cells 10000 \
    --total-droplets-included 40000 \
    --low-count-threshold 50

The --low-count-threshold should help tell cellbender identify the empty droplets, by telling it to ignore barcodes with counts < 50.

@sjfleming
Copy link
Member

These kinds of things should be a lot better in v0.3.0

Potentially closed by #238

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants