Swift Client Implementation #70
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dimitribouniol
force-pushed
the
dimitri/client
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f9d553e to
090c909
Compare
…tial source identifiers
…ration and authentication
…finalizing the results and coordinating in-flight tasks
dimitribouniol
force-pushed
the
dimitri/client
branch
from
a29eed3 to
13fee1d
Compare
dimitribouniol
force-pushed
the
dimitri/client
branch
from
13fee1d to
817b02e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Warning
DO NOT MERGE
Using this as a tracking branch for a reference Swift-based client implementations for users that wish to implement passkeys/WebAuthn manually on the client without the use of AuthenticationServices.
I'll be breaking commits off of this little by little to merge upstream, but figured it would be a useful reference for the "big picture" direction those PRs may be going in.