Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fasm2bels parts db #494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

fasm2bels parts db #494

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

yonnorc42
Copy link
Contributor

@yonnorc42 yonnorc42 commented Jul 9, 2024

Instead of running fasm2bels on the basic/and3 design, I directly invoke the fasm2bels command which generates the db. This means we skip synthesis, implementation, and all the other unnecessary steps we were doing before, and now we don't have to worry about the situation in which ninja gives the message "no work to do" if we already ran the fasm2bels flow on basic/and3 earlier.

@yonnorc42 yonnorc42 requested a review from jgoeders July 9, 2024 21:36
@jgoeders jgoeders merged commit 1307094 into main Jul 10, 2024
18 checks passed
@jgoeders jgoeders deleted the fasm2bels_db branch July 10, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants