Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle dsps #495

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

handle dsps #495

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

yonnorc42
Copy link
Contributor

@yonnorc42 yonnorc42 commented Jul 12, 2024

Handles DSPs by ignoring the pin if it meets the criteria of being the opposite const net of the original, and the IS_x_INVERTED property being true for that pin. Let me know what you think @reillymck If this solution isn't viable, then we need to adjust some fasm2bels code instead of our code, because this is the only solution using our code that I've thought of.

@yonnorc42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I need to fix this, it's not working right now

@yonnorc42
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is working now

@yonnorc42 yonnorc42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2024 20:17
@reillymck
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if we can do this since the property isn't showing up for one of the designs. For all we know fasm2bels is right about the property and vivado is hiding it. Let's hold off on putting this in main for now. But, let's keep using it for now so that these pins pass and we see if there are other things to work on or if this is the only thing holding us back from passing.

@yonnorc42 yonnorc42 marked this pull request as draft July 14, 2024 19:25
@jgoeders jgoeders marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2024 20:25
@jgoeders jgoeders merged commit 5b34541 into main Jul 17, 2024
18 checks passed
@jgoeders jgoeders deleted the handle_dsps branch July 17, 2024 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants