You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Chenxi,
Compared with 3d-dna, yahs' scaffolding speed and clustering sorting accuracy are so excellent! My genome is about 1g, and the heterozygosity is less than 0.2%. I am curious why only 91% of the sequences are anchored to the chromosome, while 3ddna is easily as high as 97%. I don't know whether this is related to species. If we don't consider the influence of sequencing depth of Hi-C data, can we think that the main reason why there are no anchored sequences is that the alignment quality of these sequences is lower than Q10, or that these sequences are redundant parts generated by the assembly software?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Chenxi,
Compared with 3d-dna, yahs' scaffolding speed and clustering sorting accuracy are so excellent! My genome is about 1g, and the heterozygosity is less than 0.2%. I am curious why only 91% of the sequences are anchored to the chromosome, while 3ddna is easily as high as 97%. I don't know whether this is related to species. If we don't consider the influence of sequencing depth of Hi-C data, can we think that the main reason why there are no anchored sequences is that the alignment quality of these sequences is lower than Q10, or that these sequences are redundant parts generated by the assembly software?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: