added fsConfig for cacheHandler #889
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several configuration files and modifications within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.idea/.gitignore(1 hunks).idea/inspectionProfiles/Project_Default.xml(1 hunks).idea/modules.xml(1 hunks).idea/next-shared-cache.iml(1 hunks).idea/prettier.xml(1 hunks).idea/vcs.xml(1 hunks)packages/cache-handler/src/cache-handler.ts(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.idea/next-shared-cache.iml (1)
1-12: Configuration looks good but should be excluded from version control
The module configuration is properly structured with appropriate temporary directory exclusions. However, as this is an IDE-specific configuration file, it should be excluded from version control along with the entire .idea directory.
| CacheHandler.#fsConf.writeFile(pageHtmlPath, pageData.html), | ||
| CacheHandler.#fsConf.writeFile(pageDataPath, JSON.stringify(pageData.pageData)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential JSON stringification errors
When writing pageData to a file, JSON.stringify could throw an error if the data contains circular references. Ensure that the data is serializable or handle errors appropriately.
Consider wrapping JSON.stringify in a try-catch block or sanitizing pageData before writing it.
| static #fsConf: fsConfig = fsPromises; | ||
|
|
||
| static setFsConf(fsConf: fsConfig) { | ||
| CacheHandler.#fsConf = fsConf; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Assess thread safety with mutable static properties
Modifying the static property #fsConf at runtime using setFsConf can lead to concurrency issues in a multi-threaded environment.
- Potential Risk: If
CacheHandleris used in concurrent contexts, changes to#fsConfcould affect other instances unexpectedly. - Recommendation: Consider passing
fsConfas a parameter to instance methods or using dependency injection to avoid shared mutable state.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Ensure consistency in static property and method definitions
- Update Types and Names: With the renaming of
fsConfigtoFsConfig, update the property and method accordingly. - Type Safety: Ensure that the default value assigned to
#fsConfmatches theFsConfigtype.
Apply this diff to update the names:
-static #fsConf: fsConfig = fsPromises;
+static #fsConf: FsConfig = {
+ open: fsPromises.open,
+ readFile: fsPromises.readFile,
+ writeFile: fsPromises.writeFile,
+ mkdir: fsPromises.mkdir,
+ stat: fsPromises.stat,
+ close: (handle) => handle.close(),
+};
-static setFsConf(fsConf: fsConfig) {
+static setFsConf(fsConf: FsConfig) {
CacheHandler.#fsConf = fsConf;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static #fsConf: fsConfig = fsPromises; | |
| static setFsConf(fsConf: fsConfig) { | |
| CacheHandler.#fsConf = fsConf; | |
| } | |
| static #fsConf: FsConfig = { | |
| open: fsPromises.open, | |
| readFile: fsPromises.readFile, | |
| writeFile: fsPromises.writeFile, | |
| mkdir: fsPromises.mkdir, | |
| stat: fsPromises.stat, | |
| close: (handle) => handle.close(), | |
| }; | |
| static setFsConf(fsConf: FsConfig) { | |
| CacheHandler.#fsConf = fsConf; | |
| } |
| /** | ||
| * A Configuration options for file system management. Used for testing. By default, it's a regular fsPromise. | ||
| * | ||
| * @default fsPromise | ||
| * | ||
| * @since 1.9.0 | ||
| */ | ||
| export type fsConfig = { | ||
| open: typeof fsPromises.open; | ||
| readFile: typeof fsPromises.readFile; | ||
| writeFile: typeof fsPromises.writeFile; | ||
| mkdir: typeof fsPromises.mkdir | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refine the fsConfig type definition and documentation
The introduction of the fsConfig type to encapsulate file system operations is a good approach for enhancing flexibility and testability. However, consider the following improvements:
- Include All Used Methods: Ensure that all file system methods used in
CacheHandlerare included in thefsConfigtype. Methods likestatandcloseare used but are not defined infsConfig. - Naming Convention: TypeScript types are typically named using PascalCase. Rename
fsConfigtoFsConfigfor consistency.
Apply this diff to refine the type definition:
-export type fsConfig = {
+export type FsConfig = {
open: typeof fsPromises.open;
readFile: typeof fsPromises.readFile;
writeFile: typeof fsPromises.writeFile;
mkdir: typeof fsPromises.mkdir;
+ stat: typeof fsPromises.stat;
+ close: (handle: fsPromises.FileHandle) => Promise<void>;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /** | |
| * A Configuration options for file system management. Used for testing. By default, it's a regular fsPromise. | |
| * | |
| * @default fsPromise | |
| * | |
| * @since 1.9.0 | |
| */ | |
| export type fsConfig = { | |
| open: typeof fsPromises.open; | |
| readFile: typeof fsPromises.readFile; | |
| writeFile: typeof fsPromises.writeFile; | |
| mkdir: typeof fsPromises.mkdir | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * A Configuration options for file system management. Used for testing. By default, it's a regular fsPromise. | |
| * | |
| * @default fsPromise | |
| * | |
| * @since 1.9.0 | |
| */ | |
| export type FsConfig = { | |
| open: typeof fsPromises.open; | |
| readFile: typeof fsPromises.readFile; | |
| writeFile: typeof fsPromises.writeFile; | |
| mkdir: typeof fsPromises.mkdir; | |
| stat: typeof fsPromises.stat; | |
| close: (handle: fsPromises.FileHandle) => Promise<void>; | |
| } |
| pageHtmlHandle = await CacheHandler.#fsConf.open(pageHtmlPath, 'r'); | ||
|
|
||
| const [pageHtmlFile, { mtimeMs }, pageData] = await Promise.all([ | ||
| pageHtmlHandle.readFile('utf-8'), | ||
| pageHtmlHandle.stat(), | ||
| fsPromises.readFile(pageDataPath, 'utf-8').then((data) => JSON.parse(data) as object), | ||
| CacheHandler.#fsConf.readFile(pageDataPath, 'utf-8').then((data) => JSON.parse(data) as object), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Direct fsPromises usage found in register-initial-cache.ts
The verification revealed that while cache-handler.ts correctly uses #fsConf for file operations, there are multiple direct usages of fsPromises in packages/cache-handler/src/instrumentation/register-initial-cache.ts. These should be updated to use the configured file system interface for consistency:
register-initial-cache.ts:- Line 96:
fsPromises.readFile(prerenderManifestPath, 'utf-8') - Line 145:
fsPromises.stat(${pathToRouteFiles}.body) - Line 165:
fsPromises.readFile(${pathToRouteFiles}.body) - Line 220:
fsPromises.stat(${pathToRouteFiles}.html) - Line 307:
fsPromises.readdir(fetchCacheDir) - Line 327:
fsPromises.stat(filePath) - Line 343:
fsPromises.readFile(...)
- Line 96:
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify all fsPromises references are replaced with #fsConf
Ensure that all file system operations within CacheHandler use CacheHandler.#fsConf instead of fsPromises. Any remaining direct references to fsPromises could lead to inconsistent behavior and reduce the benefits of configuring fsConf.
Run the following script to check for any missed references:
Also applies to: 470-470, 473-474, 564-564, 597-597
Let me verify if there are any actual usages of fsPromises in the code beyond the type definitions and imports by checking the actual function calls.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of fsPromises in cache-handler.ts
# Test: Search for 'fsPromises' in the file. Expect: No occurrences found.
rg 'fsPromises' packages/cache-handler/src/cache-handler.ts
Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for actual usage of fsPromises in function calls or operations
ast-grep --pattern 'fsPromises.$_($_)'
# Also check for any direct fsPromises usage
ast-grep --pattern 'fsPromises'
Length of output: 3001
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | ||
| <project version="4"> | ||
| <component name="VcsDirectoryMappings"> | ||
| <mapping directory="$PROJECT_DIR$" vcs="Git" /> | ||
| </component> | ||
| </project> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid committing IDE-specific configuration files
The file .idea/vcs.xml contains user-specific IDE settings that may not be applicable to all contributors.
- Recommendation: Add
.idea/vcs.xmlto the.gitignorefile to prevent it from being tracked in version control.
| # Default ignored files | ||
| /shelf/ | ||
| /workspace.xml | ||
| # Editor-based HTTP Client requests | ||
| /httpRequests/ | ||
| # Datasource local storage ignored files | ||
| /dataSources/ | ||
| /dataSources.local.xml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Update .gitignore to exclude additional IDE files
To maintain a clean repository, consider ignoring more IDE-specific files:
- Add
vcs.xml: Sincevcs.xmlis user-specific, it should be ignored. - Add
prettier.xmland inspection profiles: These configurations might differ between users.
Apply this diff to update the .gitignore:
# Default ignored files
/shelf/
/workspace.xml
+# Version Control settings
+/vcs.xml
+# Prettier configuration
+/prettier.xml
+# Inspection profiles
+/inspectionProfiles/
# Editor-based HTTP Client requests
/httpRequests/
# Datasource local storage ignored files
/dataSources/
/dataSources.local.xml📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Default ignored files | |
| /shelf/ | |
| /workspace.xml | |
| # Editor-based HTTP Client requests | |
| /httpRequests/ | |
| # Datasource local storage ignored files | |
| /dataSources/ | |
| /dataSources.local.xml | |
| # Default ignored files | |
| /shelf/ | |
| /workspace.xml | |
| # Version Control settings | |
| /vcs.xml | |
| # Prettier configuration | |
| /prettier.xml | |
| # Inspection profiles | |
| /inspectionProfiles/ | |
| # Editor-based HTTP Client requests | |
| /httpRequests/ | |
| # Datasource local storage ignored files | |
| /dataSources/ | |
| /dataSources.local.xml |
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | ||
| <project version="4"> | ||
| <component name="PrettierConfiguration"> | ||
| <option name="myConfigurationMode" value="AUTOMATIC" /> | ||
| </component> | ||
| </project> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider whether to commit IDE-specific Prettier configuration
The file .idea/prettier.xml configures Prettier settings for your IDE.
- Consistency vs. Flexibility: Committing this file can enforce consistent formatting settings across the team if everyone uses the same IDE. However, it may cause conflicts if team members use different IDEs or personal settings.
| <component name="InspectionProjectProfileManager"> | ||
| <profile version="1.0"> | ||
| <option name="myName" value="Project Default" /> | ||
| <inspection_tool class="Eslint" enabled="true" level="WARNING" enabled_by_default="true" /> | ||
| </profile> | ||
| </component> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Evaluate the necessity of committing IDE inspection profiles
The inspection profile in .idea/inspectionProfiles/Project_Default.xml enables ESLint inspections in your IDE.
- Alternative Approach: Rely on shared ESLint configuration files (like
.eslintrc) in the project root, which work across different editors and IDEs. - Potential Issues: Committing IDE-specific settings may lead to merge conflicts or unexpected behavior for team members who customize their own inspection profiles.
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | ||
| <project version="4"> | ||
| <component name="ProjectModuleManager"> | ||
| <modules> | ||
| <module fileurl="file://$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/next-shared-cache.iml" filepath="$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/next-shared-cache.iml" /> | ||
| </modules> | ||
| </component> | ||
| </project> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider excluding IDE-specific files from version control
While the XML configuration is correct, IDE-specific configuration files should typically be excluded from version control as they can vary between team members and development environments.
Consider adding the .idea/ directory to your root .gitignore file. Here's a verification script to check if it's already excluded:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if .idea directory is excluded in .gitignore
# Test: Look for .idea exclusion in .gitignore
if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then
echo "Checking .gitignore for .idea exclusion..."
grep -n "^\.idea/" .gitignore || echo ".idea/ is not excluded in .gitignore"
else
echo ".gitignore file not found"
fi
The current implementation of the cache-handler class is closely dependent on fsPromise. To get rid of this dependency, fsConf was written, which contains all the important methods that are used in this class. fsPromise is also used by default, but a different logic will be supplied for testing
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.gitignore, ESLint settings, Prettier configuration, and version control settings.Bug Fixes
Documentation