Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Use datetime.fromisoformat in server uniqueness check #395

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

cbartz
Copy link
Collaborator

@cbartz cbartz commented Oct 23, 2024

Applicable spec: n/a

Overview

Pin to include canonical/github-runner-manager#27

Checklist

  • The charm style guide was applied.
  • The contributing guide was applied.
  • The changes are compliant with ISD054 - Managing Charm Complexity
  • The documentation is generated using src-docs.
  • The documentation for charmhub is updated.
  • The PR is tagged with appropriate label (urgent, trivial, complex).
  • The changelog is updated with changes that affects the users of the charm.
  • The changes do not introduce any regression in code or tests related to LXD runner mode.

alithethird
alithethird previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
yanksyoon
yanksyoon previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
weiiwang01
weiiwang01 previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
@cbartz cbartz marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 09:21
@cbartz cbartz requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 09:21
Copy link
Contributor

Test coverage for 8822c9e

Name                         Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
src/charm.py                   630    166    140     27    70%   247-249, 315-334, 352-354, 355->359, 385-389, 463-465, 474, 481-483, 504-509, 526-532, 553, 565-571, 586-587, 606-607, 616, 621, 651-652, 654->663, 658->663, 668-674, 708, 712-717, 768-773, 782->785, 808-820, 824-825, 853-880, 893-898, 917-927, 942-944, 991-992, 994-995, 997-998, 1077->1079, 1144-1145, 1183-1185, 1193-1199, 1277-1310, 1324-1329, 1344-1387, 1395-1396, 1418
src/charm_state.py             450     17     82      3    95%   274-286, 505-509, 631-632, 687-688, 1123->1126, 1130-1131, 1178
src/errors.py                   25      0      0      0   100%
src/event_timer.py              52      6      0      0    88%   105-106, 143-144, 160-161
src/firewall.py                 51     18     10      0    67%   42-43, 66-69, 111-185
src/github_client.py            23      2      4      0    93%   71-72
src/logrotate.py                43      0      2      0   100%
src/lxd_type.py                 35      0      0      0   100%
src/runner_manager_type.py      39      0      0      0   100%
src/runner_type.py              38      0      0      0   100%
src/shared_fs.py                98     17     10      1    83%   60-61, 132-133, 162-163, 171-172, 178-179, 210, 213-214, 226-227, 270-271
src/utilities.py                32      4      6      2    79%   66-69, 111
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                         1516    230    254     33    83%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2024-10-23 09:22:38.344490

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 5045
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 2
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 6

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):

@cbartz cbartz merged commit b9130e6 into main Oct 23, 2024
42 checks passed
@cbartz cbartz deleted the fix/datetime-format-unique-check branch October 23, 2024 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants