Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): update carbon and gatsby-theme-carbon deps #4385

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

carbon-automation[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Automated pull request to update Carbon and gatsby-theme-carbon on the website
Checklist

  • Verify package version bumps are accurate
  • Verify CI passes as expected
  • Verify no regressions on the website in the deploy preview

@carbon-automation carbon-automation bot requested review from a team as code owners December 5, 2024 19:27
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
carbondesignsystem ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 16, 2024 8:11pm

@tay1orjones
Copy link
Member

Whoever ends up being the last reviewer here - feel free to hit merge once you approve!

@aagonzales
Copy link
Member

@tay1orjones the vercel failed so I can't check the preview.

@tay1orjones
Copy link
Member

@aagonzales sorry about that - looks like the preview succeeded on the latest commit

@tay1orjones tay1orjones enabled auto-merge (squash) December 16, 2024 18:28
Copy link
Member

@aagonzales aagonzales left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup everything looks good to me!

@tay1orjones tay1orjones merged commit bc0663b into main Dec 16, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@tay1orjones tay1orjones deleted the release/update-carbon-deps branch December 16, 2024 20:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants