-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cardano-api: 10.6 #1791
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
cardano-api: 10.6 #1791
Conversation
56f9900
to
849a996
Compare
@noonio Mostly there but hit some surprising plutus errors in CI. |
4c7958c
to
5815101
Compare
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.87 | 0.2 | - | |
2 | 1 | 0.22 | - | |
3 | 1.21 | 0.27 | - | |
5 | 1.67 | 0.38 | +0.01 | |
10 | 2.64 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | 1.44 | 0.32 | 0.01 |
2 | - | - | 1.91 | 0.42 | 0.02 |
3 | - | - | 3.6 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
4 | - | - | 3.3 | 0.75 | 0.03 |
5 | - | - | 1.45 | 0.3 | 0.01 |
6 | - | - | 5.5 | 1.26 | 0.05 |
7 | - | - | 2.25 | 0.47 | 0.02 |
8 | - | - | 7.37 | 1.69 | 0.07 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | 0.98 | 0.22 | 0.01 |
2 | - | 1.51 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
3 | - | 1.27 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
5 | - | 2.13 | 0.48 | 0.02 |
10 | - | 3.15 | 0.71 | 0.03 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | 1.27 | 0.29 | 0.02 |
2 | - | 1.52 | 0.34 | 0.02 |
3 | - | 1.62 | 0.36 | 0.02 |
5 | - | 1.57 | 0.35 | 0.02 |
10 | - | 2.73 | 0.6 | 0.02 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | 2.16 | 0.48 | 0.02 |
2 | - | 2.34 | 0.53 | 0.02 |
3 | - | 2.61 | 0.59 | 0.02 |
5 | - | 2.78 | 0.63 | 0.03 |
10 | - | 4.06 | 0.91 | 0.04 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | 2.6 | 0.58 | 0.02 |
2 | - | 2.81 | 0.63 | 0.02 |
3 | - | 2.93 | 0.66 | 0.03 |
5 | - | 3.55 | 0.8 | 0.03 |
10 | - | 4.95 | 1.11 | 0.04 |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | 2 | 0.44 | 0.01 | |
(1, 10) | - | 2.45 | 0.55 | 0.02 | |
(5, 10) | - | 2.95 | 0.66 | 0.02 | |
(10, 10) | - | 3.71 | 0.83 | 0.03 | |
(20, 10) | - | 5.38 | 1.21 | 0.04 |
b886eee
to
453ea3f
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6094 | 11.23 | 3.50 | 0.53 |
2 | 6292 | 13.04 | 4.04 | 0.56 |
3 | 6496 | 15.50 | 4.80 | 0.60 |
5 | 6895 | 20.19 | 6.25 | 0.66 |
10 | 7907 | 31.36 | 9.67 | 0.82 |
40 | 13936 | 98.79 | 30.35 | 1.78 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 743 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 923 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1278 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2182 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10066 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 26.47 | 7.60 | 0.44 |
2 | 113 | 640 | 35.97 | 10.25 | 0.54 |
3 | 170 | 747 | 43.14 | 12.35 | 0.62 |
4 | 227 | 858 | 50.39 | 14.50 | 0.70 |
5 | 284 | 969 | 59.44 | 17.07 | 0.80 |
6 | 337 | 1081 | 73.00 | 20.70 | 0.94 |
7 | 397 | 1192 | 78.41 | 22.39 | 1.00 |
8 | 450 | 1303 | 86.81 | 24.75 | 1.09 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1800 | 25.50 | 8.33 | 0.50 |
2 | 1920 | 26.68 | 9.39 | 0.52 |
3 | 2209 | 30.29 | 11.34 | 0.57 |
5 | 2341 | 31.96 | 13.00 | 0.61 |
10 | 3209 | 44.66 | 20.56 | 0.80 |
37 | 7094 | 93.63 | 54.19 | 1.61 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 613 | 23.68 | 7.54 | 0.42 |
2 | 796 | 26.82 | 9.06 | 0.47 |
3 | 934 | 28.17 | 10.10 | 0.49 |
5 | 1183 | 31.36 | 12.31 | 0.54 |
10 | 2042 | 43.15 | 18.88 | 0.72 |
36 | 5988 | 98.41 | 51.40 | 1.58 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 664 | 30.91 | 9.68 | 0.50 |
2 | 895 | 31.64 | 10.74 | 0.52 |
3 | 1013 | 33.48 | 11.97 | 0.55 |
5 | 1270 | 37.10 | 14.40 | 0.61 |
10 | 1917 | 48.90 | 21.23 | 0.78 |
33 | 5465 | 99.47 | 52.97 | 1.58 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 695 | 35.91 | 11.00 | 0.55 |
2 | 801 | 38.15 | 12.32 | 0.58 |
3 | 1001 | 41.07 | 13.96 | 0.63 |
5 | 1204 | 44.63 | 16.25 | 0.68 |
10 | 2023 | 56.70 | 23.43 | 0.87 |
27 | 4510 | 98.42 | 47.87 | 1.49 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5973 | 28.20 | 9.30 | 0.71 |
2 | 6110 | 37.47 | 12.36 | 0.81 |
3 | 6216 | 46.96 | 15.46 | 0.91 |
4 | 6464 | 58.13 | 19.28 | 1.04 |
5 | 6687 | 69.82 | 23.21 | 1.18 |
6 | 6641 | 73.48 | 24.27 | 1.21 |
7 | 6824 | 88.11 | 29.11 | 1.37 |
8 | 6878 | 92.29 | 30.41 | 1.42 |
9 | 6934 | 98.21 | 32.35 | 1.48 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0 | 0 | 6092 | 19.40 | 6.38 | 0.62 |
10 | 1 | 57 | 6125 | 21.79 | 7.29 | 0.65 |
10 | 5 | 285 | 6262 | 30.77 | 10.75 | 0.75 |
10 | 10 | 569 | 6430 | 40.70 | 14.64 | 0.87 |
10 | 20 | 1137 | 6768 | 62.72 | 23.14 | 1.12 |
10 | 37 | 2109 | 7351 | 98.48 | 37.03 | 1.54 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-01-24 11:59:20.65494929 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.396035800 |
P99 | 9.252463729999993ms |
P95 | 5.7543849499999995ms |
P50 | 4.153285ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 22.067600147 |
P99 | 36.72878359ms |
P95 | 28.980727249999997ms |
P50 | 20.571375ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
c3055c6
to
4f94175
Compare
4f94175
to
f0d0428
Compare
No description provided.