Fix multiple overlapping card in a stack due to spam clicking

[FadhlanR]

Ticket: CS-6590

This PR addresses an issue where multiple overlapping cards could appear in a stack if the user spam-clicked the card grid item. To prevent this, I've implemented a mechanism to disallow multiple cards with the same ID from being opened in a stack. Additionally, if there are duplicate cards in a stack, the latest one will be opened at the top of the stack. While it's unlikely that we'd need multiple cards with the same ID in a stack, I'm open to exploring alternative approaches to resolve this issue.

Based on @jurgenwerk 's feedback, I updated the approach to solve this issue by using dropTask.

[github-actions]

Test Results

528 tests  +1   524 ✔️ +1   7m 15s ⏱️ +7s
    1 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c386554. ± Comparison against base commit 755a1da.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[jurgenwerk]

I am not able to reproduce this locally, but I tried double clicking on current staging where things are currently not the fastest and I was able to reproduce this by a quick double click on the grid item where 2 of the same cards opened on the stack.

I am wondering if this could be solved by changing the type of viewCard task from restartable to drop (i.e. ignore subsequent attempts if the attempted card did not open yet)

[FadhlanR]

I am not able to reproduce this locally, but I tried double clicking on current staging where things are currently not the fastest and I was able to reproduce this by a quick double click on the grid item where 2 of the same cards opened on the stack.

I am wondering if this could be solved by changing the type of viewCard task from restartable to drop (i.e. ignore subsequent attempts if the attempted card did not open yet)

I attempted to update the viewCard function with dropTask, but the test failed because duplicate cards can still appear in the stack. (EDIT)

It works using dropTask and I updated the test. 7f01263

[tintinthong]

Lgtm. I think it seems right to use dropTask