Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider explicitly introducing "dot" #61

Open
tbooth opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider explicitly introducing "dot" #61

tbooth opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
reviewer Issues arising from comments on https://github.com/carpentries-lab/reviews/issues/17 type:enhancement Propose enhancement to the lesson

Comments

@tbooth
Copy link
Collaborator

tbooth commented Jul 26, 2024

From @cmeesters:

Idea:

I usually prefer using dot - and demonstrate all possible workflow representations. This way, participants
know how to display and copy&paste "their" DAGs for presentation purposes.

I agree that knowing about the details of the dot program is a very useful thing, but I feel it would be a bit much to introduce it here in this chapter where there is already a lot going on. I'd propose to cover this in additional material that deals with sharing and re-using workflows.

@tbooth tbooth added type:enhancement Propose enhancement to the lesson reviewer Issues arising from comments on https://github.com/carpentries-lab/reviews/issues/17 labels Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
reviewer Issues arising from comments on https://github.com/carpentries-lab/reviews/issues/17 type:enhancement Propose enhancement to the lesson
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant