Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous minor wording / emphasis / link changes #1627

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mfisher87
Copy link

@mfisher87 mfisher87 commented Nov 23, 2023

If this pull request addresses an open issue on the repository, please add 'Closes #NN' below, where NN is the issue number.

Please briefly summarise the changes made in the pull request, and the reason(s) for making these changes.

I completed instructor training recently (it was awesome) and took some notes where I got briefly "stuck" and distracted reading the curriculum. More rationale in commit messages about the specific changes :)

As I was working on this I also noticed some links in CONTRIBUTING.md didn't behave as expected, and looking at CONTRIBUTING.md in other lesson repos, I think the preferred terminology changed from "master repository" to "upstream repository", so I got that while I was in there too.

Thanks all!

If any relevant discussions have taken place elsewhere, please provide links to these.

For more guidance on how to contribute changes to a Carpentries project, please review the Contributing Guide and Code of Conduct.

Please keep in mind that lesson Maintainers are volunteers and it may be some time before they can respond to your contribution. Although not all contributions can be incorporated into the lesson materials, we appreciate your time and effort to improve the curriculum. If you have any questions about the lesson maintenance process or would like to volunteer your time as a contribution reviewer, please contact The Carpentries Team at [email protected].

After reading this paragraph the first time, I wanted to skim back for
the 4 elements of the rubric, and it took me longer than I would have
liked to find them, which was a tiny bit distracting. I think bolding
helps!
The previous use of "they" refers to "people", so I feel this use of
"they" needs to be clarified. I got a bit stuck my first time reading
ths sentence :)
Copy link

🆗 Pre-flight checks passed 😃

This pull request has been checked and contains no modified workflow files, spoofing, or invalid commits.

It should be safe to Approve and Run the workflows that need maintainer approval.

@mfisher87 mfisher87 changed the title Miscellaneous minor wording / emphasis changes Miscellaneous minor wording / emphasis / link changes Nov 23, 2023
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ In brief:
1. The published copy of the lesson is in the `gh-pages` branch of the repository
(so that GitHub will regenerate it automatically).
Please create all branches from that,
and merge the [master repository][repo]'s `gh-pages` branch into your `gh-pages` branch
and merge the [upstream repository][repo]'s `gh-pages` branch into your `gh-pages` branch
before starting work.
Please do *not* work directly in your `gh-pages` branch,
since that will make it difficult for you to work on other contributions.
Copy link
Author

@mfisher87 mfisher87 Nov 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This instruction about creating branches from gh-pages doesn't seem to reflect the reality of how this repo is being used, so I followed the pattern it looked like others were following.

https://github.com/carpentries/sandpaper/raw/main/vignettes/articles/img/branch-flow.svg

Is this a vestigial instruction? gh-pages seems to only be updated by GitHub Actions in the way I'm used to.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @mfisher87 ! I think the most functional change is to update gh-pages to main in all cases (even if gh-pages is technically the published branch). Pinging @tobyhodges to verify.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @karenword :)

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ In brief:
1. The published copy of the lesson is in the `gh-pages` branch of the repository
(so that GitHub will regenerate it automatically).
Please create all branches from that,
and merge the [master repository][repo]'s `gh-pages` branch into your `gh-pages` branch
and merge the [upstream repository][repo]'s `gh-pages` branch into your `gh-pages` branch
before starting work.
Please do *not* work directly in your `gh-pages` branch,
since that will make it difficult for you to work on other contributions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @mfisher87 ! I think the most functional change is to update gh-pages to main in all cases (even if gh-pages is technically the published branch). Pinging @tobyhodges to verify.

@ndporter
Copy link
Contributor

@tobyhodges is this still relevant? If so, can you review and approve or request changes? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants