Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add proof of concept script and framework for Relationship illustration #136

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Some existing scripts were updated from pre-commit review.

This is in preparation of adding a Python script to CASE-Examples.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member Author

I'm fine with this being merged once CI passes.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2023 02:22
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist force-pushed the start_relationship_visualization branch 2 times, most recently from e89532e to 3a26b68 Compare September 26, 2023 02:27
This also sets up README sections, and in some cases stub README files,
to show the availability of the Relationship renders.

A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

Disclaimer:
Participation by NIST in the creation of the documentation of mentioned
software is not intended to imply a recommendation or endorsement by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to
imply that any specific software is necessarily the best available for
the purpose.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@kchason kchason merged commit 787bf0e into master Sep 26, 2023
1 check passed
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist deleted the start_relationship_visualization branch October 24, 2023 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants