-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: hollow aggregated proofs #149
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
panic!("must provide at least 2 proofs"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Read all public values |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, minor update to the inputs, we should have verification keys here as well:
// Read all verification keys first |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no worries! I'll wait for your PR to merge and then I can replicate it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be addressed! :)
e27c397
to
707643c
Compare
@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@ | |||
sp1_zkvm::entrypoint!(main); | |||
|
|||
use blevm_common::BlevmOutput; | |||
use celestia_types::nmt::Namespace; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was seeing warnings for unused imports
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Can you please add to PR description how this was tested? Also linking to GH issue helps reviewer.
- How does a developer switch from using the real aggregate proof to the hollowed out proof?
- [Optional but highly encouraged] the point of this issue is to make it easier / fasted to develop on this repo. We should include that in the description of Aggregated empty proofs for blEVM #144. In this PR, we could add to the README that it takes "x" minutes to generate a real aggregate proof for 2 EVM blocks. It takes "y" minutes to generate a hollowed out aggregate proof. That way developers know how long it should take to generate. See
celestia-zkevm-ibc-demo/provers/blevm/README.md
Lines 91 to 96 in 231c10c
How long does it take to generate a proof? | SP1_PROVER | Program | Time | |------------|------------|------------| | network | blevm-mock | 30 seconds | | network | blevm | 6 minutes |
Closes #144