-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cview-issuer for cert-manager #1541
Conversation
cview-issuser-1 Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
✅ Deploy Preview for cert-manager ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
Hi, Can you prioritize this issue? |
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
@jakexks Please help me with this npm check. I do not understand why it is failed.
|
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
The spelling has been corrected. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
@djkormo: you cannot LGTM your own PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
@djkormo: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: sorah. Note that only cert-manager members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, thanks for contributing!
It looks like the deploy preview is showing a broken link for this. Looks like the ca:cview-issuer
link hasn't been added.
Could you fix that? I'd be happy to merge then!
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ The following list contains all known cert-manager issuer integrations. | |||
| 🥈 | aws-privateca-issuer | [📄][config:aws-privateca-issuer] | [AWS Private Certificate Authority][ca:aws-privateca-issuer] | - | [✔️][release:aws-privateca-issuer] | ✔️ | | |||
| 🥈 | ca-issuer (in-tree) | [📄][config:ca-issuer] | CA issuer | - | [✔️][release:cert-manager] | ✔️ | | |||
| 🥈 | command-issuer | [📄][config:command-issuer] | [Keyfactor Command][ca:command-issuer] | - | [✔️][release:command-issuer] | ✔️ | | |||
| 🥈 | cview-issuer | [📄][config:cview-issuer] | [cview-issuer][ca:cview-issuer] | - | [✔️][release:cview-issuer] | ❌ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have a releases page? We have to make sure the issuer has had a release in the last 12 months.
Also, can you confirm the following (does not require a proof):
- These issuers are known to support and honor approval.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a release page for helm chart. But the release of issuer image is in a private repo.
Images for issuer are visible on docker hub . https://hub.docker.com/r/devsecurely/cview-issuer/tags
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Pudłowski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updating the link, it looks correct now!
There's one last thing based on inteon's comment - can you confirm that your issuer honors approval?
That is, it will not issue for a cert request which is not marked "Approved"?
If your issuer is based on issuer-lib
then it should handle approval. If it's more custom it might not, so we need to check!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
/hold We can unhold once you confirm it does handle approval.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: djkormo, inteon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Code was written on the base from this repo It does handle approval. |
/unhold |
New issuer has been created for cert-manager. It uses cview as dedicated CA. The website of this produkt product https://www.secure-ly.com/c-view-professional-certificates-lifecycle-management/ . Issuer is not open-sourced.