-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Version 3.0 ideas #1661
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Version 3.0 ideas #1661
Conversation
Architecture ideas for IntelMQ 3.0
… version-3.0-ideas
DOC 3.0 requirements: add evaluation, milestones
There are two open pull requests to the branch: Please resolve them first. There is also a merge conflict in Merging into master would mean we do a new feature release (2.3.0) with the current state of the develop branch which contains a development version. Additionally, to keep IntelMQ version numbers in sync with IntelMQ Manager's, we'd need to do a IntelMQ Manger 2.3.0 release but the latter is not yet ready, but we are working on it to make it release-ready. I therefore propose, to not merge into master for now. Alternatively we can do a minimal bugfix release by cherry-picking all the commits to the maintenance branch and make a bugfix release, but I don't think it's worth the effort. |
How is the situation now? I think it should be rather easy to "backport"/cherry pick this markdown document so that it's actually visible in develop/master. After all, it's just a document and no code. |
There is still an open PR to this branch: #1528 And could please squash the commits? |
REST API ideas for 3.0
@aaronkaplan Could you review if this PR is still valid? It looks like something interesting, but I don't know what is still up-to-date |
merge into master pls