Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENT-10647: Fixed and improved postgresql server state handling in package scriptlets (3.18) #1304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2023

Conversation

craigcomstock
Copy link
Contributor

One typo fix. This was causing failure in ALL upgrades. Ouch.

Changed wait time for server stop/start from 5 seconds to 60.

Added cf_console to pg_upgrade failure tailing so it is visible in console.

Changed condition to test for stopped/started to something that works with tighter restrictions.
Using a select as root was failing due to lack of an account in postgresql at the moment we
were checking: bare database without any further manipulation by setup scripts.

Ticket: ENT-10647
Changelog: title
(cherry picked from commit 83c91b5)

…lets

One typo fix. This was causing failure in ALL upgrades. Ouch.

Changed wait time for server stop/start from 5 seconds to 60.

Added cf_console to pg_upgrade failure tailing so it is visible in console.

Changed condition to test for stopped/started to something that works with tighter restrictions.
Using a select as root was failing due to lack of an account in postgresql at the moment we
were checking: bare database without any further manipulation by setup scripts.

Ticket: ENT-10647
Changelog: title
(cherry picked from commit 83c91b5)
@craigcomstock
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cf-bottom jenkins

@cf-bottom
Copy link

@craigcomstock
Copy link
Contributor Author

fr-tests failure is a known issue: https://northerntech.atlassian.net/browse/ENT-10632

@craigcomstock craigcomstock merged commit 799f915 into 3.18.x Sep 29, 2023
33 of 34 checks passed
@craigcomstock craigcomstock deleted the ENT-10647-2/3.18 branch September 29, 2023 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants