-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add poc changes for [#177] #298
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good so far! Very clean for the most part. One high level ask: Please add more context to the commit message. A reference to the issue is somewhat useful, but it's helpful to have a summary of the change in the git log
as well. (We rely on this heavily when preparing drafts.)
[Note, I will squash & summarize all changes in the commit, before merging this PR] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking very good! High level ask: Make sure that variable naming conventions are consistent across sharding and preparation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just nit-picky comments left.
* Support multiproofs in Prio3 * Add new Prio3SumVec variant, i.e. Prio3SumVecWithMultiproof, with configuration (field size, number of proofs) * Add with_field class methods to introduce new SumVec with configurable field size
2ee0feb
to
e11c788
Compare
Prio3
Prio3SumVec
variant, i.e.Prio3SumVecWithMultiproof
, with configuration (field size, number of proofs)with_field
class methods to introduce newSumVec
with configurable field size