Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take some of @armfazh's suggestions for common conventions #501

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

cjpatton
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #488.
cc @armfazh

These changes are mostly for clarity, but there are a few things we had underspecified:

  • The length of the output of the little-endian and big-endian encoders was not specified.

  • How the length of the little-endian and big-endian decoders was interpreted was not specified.

  • the length of the output of additive_secret_shares() was ambiguous.

draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf.md Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf.md Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@cjpatton cjpatton requested a review from armfazh October 15, 2024 20:38
draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@armfazh armfazh mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2024
These changes are mostly for clarity, but there are a few things we had
underspecified:

* The length of the output of the little-endian and big-endian encoders
  was not specified.

* How the length of the little-endian and big-endian decoders was
  interpreted was not specified.

* the length of the output of `additive_secret_shares()` was ambiguous.
@cjpatton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Squashed.

@cjpatton cjpatton merged commit 118b973 into main Oct 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@cjpatton cjpatton deleted the cjpatton/488 branch October 17, 2024 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

comments on Section 2
3 participants