Remove Field2
#507
Merged
Remove Field2
#507
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use `bool` for the IDPF control bits instead. `Field2` was relevant when we were implementing control bit masking in an earlier version of the draft, but now that we're leaving side channel considerations completely to the implementer (for readability's sake), `bool` is a little cleaner.
cjpatton
requested review from
bifurcation,
divergentdave and
schoppmp
as code owners
divergentdave
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #496.
Use
boolfor the IDPF control bits instead.Field2was relevant when we were implementing control bit masking in an earlier version of the draft, but now that we're leaving side channel considerations completely to the implementer (for readability's sake),boolis a little cleaner.