Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change measurement type of Prio3MultihotCountVec #514

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

divergentdave
Copy link
Collaborator

This implements #506. Updating the commit hash of the test vectors will have to wait for a follow-up PR.

non-zero. This allows Prio3MultihotCountVec to be composed with a randomized
response mechanism, like {{EPK14}}, for providing differential privacy. (For
example, each Client would set each entry to one with some small probability.)
For this instance of Prio3, each measurement is a vector of true and false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or just "vector of bools" or "vector of booleans"

Suggested change
For this instance of Prio3, each measurement is a vector of true and false
For this instance of Prio3, each measurement is a vector of `True` and `False`

`max_weight`); and `chunk_length`, used the same way as in {{prio3sumvec}} and
{{prio3histogram}}.
`length`, the number of entries in the count vector; `max_weight`, the maximum
number of true entries (i.e., the weight must be at most `max_weight`); and
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
number of true entries (i.e., the weight must be at most `max_weight`); and
number of `True` entries (i.e., the weight must be at most `max_weight`); and

@divergentdave divergentdave merged commit c8cdc96 into main Oct 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@divergentdave divergentdave deleted the david/multihot-count-vec-measurement-bools branch October 18, 2024 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants