Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: extra_templates allows users to control templates #1046
feat: extra_templates allows users to control templates #1046
Changes from 16 commits
079487b
2dfe715
13e2c7a
c4a468b
a3e8b56
304b06f
2918ee7
2bcc406
8cc8963
9bde2b5
201ebe7
3812c7a
16ae90a
10b55c9
e18f831
91855af
2ee374a
0928565
655c77e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential opportunity to make a helper to consolidate same mapping functionality (1)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you're right, but unfortunately, the way this codebase's packages are laid out makes this difficult without doing a bit of refactoring. The config stage structs are all pointers because the configuration can or cannot have values and then they duplicate these same structs in the plan phase once they are "resolved" (going down the tree of overwrites from global -> default -> account -> env -> component) through the tree overwrites. Resolved structs don't have pointers. I would love to simplify this code since its so copy/pasted, but maybe I will try that in a different PR