user/thrift: new package (0.21.0) #3118
Conversation
a16bitsysop
force-pushed
the
thrift
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bf92bdb to
ffd0b29
Compare
|
build is fixed now, missing file was not in source from apache |
main/thrift/template.py
Outdated
| return self.default_devel() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @subpackage("thrift-glib") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
all of these should have the -libs suffix, and an appropriate self.subdesc
and perhaps thrift-libs with self.default_libs() as well (that does not need special subdesc)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
or actually, maybe no -libs package for thrift itself, and the compiler should go in the -devel package? i don't know this well enough, it'd be good if you elaborated on it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, will add the libs suffix. If the compiler went in the -devel package the thrift package would be empty I think. For the other compilers like for example gcc-aarch64-none-elf the compiler is in the main package not -devel. I don’t know about using thrift apart from other packages need it to build I guess similar to ragel?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the CI output says:
0:06:36.911 => thrift-0.21.0-r0: changed providers:
0:06:36.911 => +cmd:thrift=0.21.0-r0
0:06:36.911 => +so:libthrift.so.0.21.0=0.21.0
that means the main package contains the command thrift, and library libthrift.so.0.21.0
i guess my question is largely if libthrift.so.0.21.0 makes sense on its own
There was a problem hiding this comment.
checking on alpine libthrift is required by libparquet, which does not currently require the other thrift libs
|
additionally this should not be |
a16bitsysop
changed the title
No description provided.