Update process_tree.py with Pair Sockets #14
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks Michael! Yep, will require some thought to make this backward compatible (or to decide how to go about breaking backward compatibility without too much inconvenience), but good to have this here as a reminder, I had totally forgotten about it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just creating a pull request for the changes Chris proposed some months ago to fix the labscript issues that we were having at NIST. It appears to have fixed our issues, and I think it's a good modification. I know Chris has to make some changes to ensure it doesn't break other things in labscript, but I figured I would at least put it out there to start the conversation.