Find and suggest fixes for geq/leq with int literals #41
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (1)
- testdata/main.go.golden: Language not supported
Comments skipped due to low confidence (1)
intrange.go:518
- [nitpick] The function name 'isNumberLit' is not very descriptive. Consider renaming it to 'isIntegerLiteral' to make it clear that it checks for integer literals specifically.
func isNumberLit(exp ast.Expr) bool {
ccoVeille
reviewed
Nov 11, 2024
ckaznocha
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #38
Also disable because it was as causing CI to fail and I find mnd to be a lot of noise for not much value.