Skip to content

Conversation

ketch
Copy link
Member

@ketch ketch commented Nov 5, 2020

No description provided.

@mandli
Copy link
Member

mandli commented Nov 5, 2020

Huh, was their a reason we did not do this in the past beyond it being inefficient?

@ketch
Copy link
Member Author

ketch commented Nov 8, 2020

Just that. An alternative would be to implement it efficiently, but only for fixed timesteps. But given that nobody has asked for it until now, I don't think it's worth it.

Don't merge this -- we'll be adding a test first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants