Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pre-commit-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Sep 30, 2024

updates:

Summary by Sourcery

Update pre-commit configuration to use the latest versions of ruff-pre-commit, validate-pyproject, and check-jsonschema hooks.

CI:

  • Update pre-commit hooks to the latest versions for ruff-pre-commit, validate-pyproject, and check-jsonschema.

updates:
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.6.7 → v0.6.8](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.6.7...v0.6.8)
- [github.com/abravalheri/validate-pyproject: v0.19 → v0.20.2](abravalheri/validate-pyproject@v0.19...v0.20.2)
- [github.com/python-jsonschema/check-jsonschema: 0.29.2 → 0.29.3](python-jsonschema/check-jsonschema@0.29.2...0.29.3)
Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates three pre-commit hooks in the project's .pre-commit-config.yaml file. The changes are automated updates to the versions of ruff-pre-commit, validate-pyproject, and check-jsonschema.

No sequence diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update ruff-pre-commit hook
  • Bump version from v0.6.7 to v0.6.8
.pre-commit-config.yaml
Update validate-pyproject hook
  • Bump version from v0.19 to v0.20.2
.pre-commit-config.yaml
Update check-jsonschema hook
  • Bump version from 0.29.2 to 0.29.3
.pre-commit-config.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Sep 30, 2024

PR Summary

  • Enhanced Ruff Pre-Commit Tool
    The version of ruff-pre-commit tool, which helps to maintain a clean and consistent codebase, has been updated from v0.6.7 to v0.6.8.

  • Improved Pyproject Validation
    The validate-pyproject tool, which isChecked the consistency and correctness of the project's Python code, has been upgraded from version v0.19 to v0.20.2.

  • Advanced JSON Schema Check
    The check-jsonschema tool, crucial for validating and verifying the structure of our JSON data, has been enhanced, upgrading from version 0.29.2 to v0.29.3.

Copy link

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

Copy link

Preparing review...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (058c1f5) to head (7479656).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #252   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           32        32           
  Lines         2695      2695           
  Branches       319       319           
=========================================
  Hits          2695      2695           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cleder cleder merged commit 83bda58 into develop Sep 30, 2024
40 checks passed
@cleder cleder deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch September 30, 2024 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant